Connect with us

Foreign

U.S. Govt: American Firms Face “Wheelbarrow Tax,” Opaque Nigerian Rules

Published

on

U.S. Govt: American Firms Face "Wheelbarrow Tax," Opaque Nigerian Rules

The United States has hailed the tax reform bills passed by the national assembly but bemoaned multiple taxations in Nigeria, claiming that U.S. companies remit 67 federal taxes, including a wheelbarrow levy.

U.S. ambassador to Nigeria, Richard Mills, disclosed this on Thursday in Lagos during a policy speech and fireside chat on the recently launched U.S. Commercial Diplomacy Strategy for Sub-Saharan Africa, as well as opportunities for expanding trade and investment ties and deepening long-term mutual prosperity between the two countries.

Mr Mills said, “One U.S. business told me that, for their operations in Nigeria, they pay 67 different federal taxes, including a tax on wheelbarrows. It is some leftover from a different age.

“So, the tax reform bill is important. Those kinds of macro-economic reforms are what we’ve wanted to see, what U.S. businesses have wanted to see.”

Relatedly, President Donald Trump has proposed a bill that will tax remittances by Nigerians and other foreigners living in the U.S..

Although Mr Mills commended the implementation of President Bola Tinubu’s bold economic reforms, he acknowledged, “I know they’ve been painful for a lot of Nigerians. I do believe our assessment is they will begin, hopefully, to have this grow to even more opportunities.”

The U.S. diplomat, while urging the Nigerian government not to relent in its efforts to curb corruption, noted that the rules set by regulatory bodies were opaque, making it difficult for companies to comply with them.

“The country also need to continue working to rid out corruption, money laundering, port congestion, lack of regulatory fairness and a level playing field. The regulatory rules here still seem very opaque hard to follow. These are the kinds of things we’re bringing to the government’s attention,” Mr Mills stated

Gazettengr.com

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Foreign

Breaking: US Announces Next Step After Invading Venezuela

Published

on

The United States has said it will be charging Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, the president and first lady of Venezuela, for terrorism and drug offences

Attorney General Pamela Bondi confirmed the development, adding that Maduro and Flores were indicted in the Southern District of New York

President Donald Trump earlier claimed that the US forces captured them in a “large-scale strike” following the US attack on the sovereign country

The United States has announced that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, would be charged with drug and terrorism offences after President Donald Trump’s claim that the US forces captured them in a “large-scale strike” on Venezuela.

Speaking on the invasion, Attorney General Pamela Bondi confirmed the development, adding that Maduro and Flores were indicted in the Southern District of New York. She added that the Venezuelan was charged with illicit drug importation conspiracy, narco-terrorism conspiracy, conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices, and possession of machine guns and destructive devices, against the United States.

According to Bonde, the mission was “incredible and highly successful”. She expressed appreciation to the US military for carrying out the mission.

Bondi described the mission as “incredible and highly successful” and expressed gratitude to the US military for carrying it out. “They will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts,” she added.

Many Americans have taken to the comment section of her post and expressed their views on the development. Below are some of their comments:

Natalie F Danelishen expressed worries:

“You guys seriously captured and arrested a president in another country before arresting anyone on the Epstein list.”

Shen Shiwei questioned the US’s right to invade another country:

“How could the U.S. legalize its ‘military aggression’ against another sovereign country of Venezuela and its president by labelling it as an “operation”? When did the U.S. domestic law rise above other countries’ domestic laws and international laws?”

“If this proceeds in U.S. courts, it sets a huge precedent, prosecuting a sitting (or recently removed) head of state blurs the line between justice and geopolitics. The real test will be due process and evidence, not the headlines.”

Amy Siskind wrote:

“I’m old enough to remember that we just pardoned and released the former president of Honduras for far worse.”

Sari Beth Rosenberg commented:

“So, what’s the difference between Maduro and the President of Honduras, whom Trump pardoned? You are all so obvious.” Beth questioned the move:

“Is this going to go like the rest of your indictments, where it ends up abandoned, dropped, or dismissed by the court?”

” See the full statement of the Attorney General on X here:

Continue Reading

Foreign

‘Supreme Banditry’: Sheikh Gumi Reacts To Trump’s Arrest Of Venezuelan President

Published

on

Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has reacted strongly to the reported arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife by former United States President Donald Trump.

Gumi’s reaction came shortly after news of the arrest began to spread. He focused his response on what he described as the abuse of global power.

According to him, powerful nations now act beyond limits and target entire countries, not just individuals.

In a post shared on his Facebook page on Saturday, the cleric described the action in harsh terms.

He wrote, “Supreme banditry doesn’t attack villages, they attack nations and kidnap leaders,” a statement widely seen as a direct swipe at Trump and the United States.

Gumi’s comments quickly drew attention due to his long-standing criticism of Western military and political influence, especially in developing countries.

He has often argued that global powers destabilize weaker nations under the guise of security and justice.

The arrest of Maduro marks a major escalation in the long-running tension between the United States and Venezuela. The Venezuelan leader has been accused by Washington of involvement in international drug trafficking and other transnational crimes. These allegations have been repeatedly denied by Maduro and his allies.

Only months ago, the United States significantly increased the reward offered for information leading to Maduro’s capture.

The bounty was raised to $50 million, making it one of the highest ever placed on a sitting head of state. The move was condemned by several governments and political groups across the world.

Trump, who announced the arrest through his personal platform, presented the action as a major victory against global crime.

However, critics argue that the move undermines international law and national sovereignty.

Continue Reading

Foreign

JUST IN: Russia Reacts To US Military Action In Venezuela

Published

on

Russia has condemned the United States’ military action in Venezuela, saying there was no credible justification for the attack and accusing Washington of allowing “ideological hostility” to override diplomacy.

Venezuela remains Russia’s key ally in South America, although the Kremlin has so far stopped short of pledging direct assistance to Caracas in the event of a conflict with the United States.

“This morning, the United States committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela. This is deeply troubling and deserves condemnation,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The ministry added that the reasons advanced to justify the operation were “untenable,” noting that ideological hostility had prevailed over pragmatic, businesslike engagement.

The statement made no reference to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, whom US President Donald Trump claimed was captured during Saturday’s military operation.

“We reaffirm our solidarity with the Venezuelan people,” the ministry said, adding that there were no reports of Russian citizens being harmed in the US strikes.

Continue Reading

Trending