Connect with us

News

Just In: Nnamdi Kanu Finally Files Defence As Court Relocates Registry To Courtroom

Published

on

Release Nnamdi Kanu, Ohanaeze Urges FG

The leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, on Friday complied with the directive of the Federal High Court, Abuja, to file his defence in the terrorism charges brought against him by the Federal Government.

Justice James Omotosho ordered the temporary relocation of the court’s registry into his courtroom after Kanu complained that he was being denied the opportunity to file his documents properly.

Following the directive, Kanu began filing his defence processes inside the courtroom.

Prosecuting counsel, Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), notified the court that he was ready to receive the documents directly within the courtroom and respond as required.

At the time of filing this report, the defence documents were still being submitted, prompting the judge to stand down the matter for one hour.

Until Friday, the IPOB leader had refused to open his defence, insisting the Federal Government must first show him the specific terrorism law he allegedly breached.

Naija News had earlier reported that Kanu’s family alleged that operatives of the Department of State Services (DSS) are deliberately frustrating his efforts to prepare for his terrorism trial scheduled for Friday.

In a statement issued on Thursday and signed by Prince Emmanuel Kanu, the family warned that the IPOB leader might be unable to appear in court, not by choice, but due to what they described as systemic denial of his constitutional rights.

The family accused the DSS of obstructing Kanu’s access to his lawyers, family members, and key witnesses needed for his defence.

According to them, “The DSS has made it almost impossible for Mazi Kanu to have proper access to his lawyers, family members and key witnesses.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

S’Court Affirms President’s Power To Declare State Of Emergency, Suspend Elected Officials

Published

on

The Supreme Court, on Monday, affirmed the constitutional power of the President to declare a state of emergency in any state to prevent a breakdown of law and order or a descent into chaos and anarchy.

In a split decision of six to one, the apex court upheld the President’s authority under the Constitution to proclaim a state of emergency.

The court further held that, during such a period, the President may suspend elected officials, provided any such suspension is for a limited duration.

Delivering the lead majority judgment, Justice Mohammed Idris held that Section 305 of the 1999 Constitution empowers the President to adopt extraordinary measures to restore normalcy where a state of emergency has been declared.

He noted that the provision does not specify the exact nature of those extraordinary measures, thereby vesting the President with discretion on how to act in such circumstances.

The judgment followed a suit instituted by states governed by the Peoples Democratic Party, challenging the declaration of a state of emergency in Rivers State by President Bola Tinubu, during which elected state officials were suspended for six months. The Supreme Court had reserved judgment in the matter in October.

The plaintiffs were the Attorneys-General of PDP-controlled states, while the defendants were the Federal Government and the National Assembly.

The suit was filed by the Attorneys-General of Adamawa, Enugu, Osun, Oyo, Bauchi, Akwa Ibom, Plateau, Delta, Taraba, Zamfara, and Bayelsa states.

The suit, marked SC/CV/329/2025, was predicated on eight grounds. The plaintiffs asked the Supreme Court to determine whether the President has the constitutional authority to suspend a democratically elected government in a state and whether the procedure adopted in declaring a state of emergency in Rivers State contravened the 1999 Constitution.

Among other reliefs, the plaintiffs urged the court to determine “whether, upon a proper construction and interpretation of Sections 1(2), 5(2), 176, 180, 188, and 305 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999, the President of the Federal Republic of Nigeria can lawfully suspend, or in any manner whatsoever interfere with, the offices of a Governor and the Deputy Governor of any of the 36 component States of the Federation and replace them with his unelected nominee as a Sole Administrator, under the guise of, or pursuant to, a Proclamation of a State of Emergency in any of the Plaintiffs’ States.”

They also asked “whether, upon a proper construction and interpretation of Sections 1(2), 4(6), 11(4) & (5), 90, 105, and 305 of the Constitution, the President can lawfully suspend the House of Assembly of any of the 36 States under the guise of, or pursuant to, a Proclamation of a State of Emergency in such States.”

In the earlier part of the judgment, Justice Idris upheld the preliminary objections raised by the defendants—the Attorney-General of the Federation and the National Assembly—against the competence of the suit.

He held that the plaintiffs failed to establish any cause of action capable of activating the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court.

In the six-to-one majority decision, the court agreed that the plaintiffs did not demonstrate the existence of an actionable dispute between them and the Federation to warrant the exercise of the court’s original jurisdiction.

Consequently, Justice Idris struck out the suit for want of jurisdiction. He nevertheless proceeded to consider the substantive issues and dismissed the case on the merits.

However, Justice Obande Ogbuinya dissented, holding that the suit succeeded in part.

He agreed that the President has the power to declare a state of emergency, but held that such power cannot be used to suspend elected state officials, including governors, deputy governors, and members of state legislatures.

More to come…

Continue Reading

News

Gowon Not Dead, Aide Dismisses Elder Statesman’s Death Rumour

Published

on

Adeyeye Ajayi, Personal Assistant to the former Head of State, General Yakubu Gowon (retd.), has dismissed circulating reports claiming that the elder statesman is dead.

In a statement issued on Sunday, Ajayi described the reports as false and misleading, warning that the unverified claims could cause unnecessary panic among the public.

He urged Nigerians to disregard the rumours, stressing that Gowon is very much alive and in good health.

“The claims making the rounds on social media about the death of General Yakubu Gowon are completely false and misleading. There is no truth whatsoever in the reports. The former military leader continues to live an active and purposeful life,” the statement read.

Ajayi added that Gowon remains engaged in public affairs and continues to make meaningful contributions to national discourse.

“General Gowon is alive, in good health, and remains active. He continues to attend public events and contribute to discussions on peace, unity, and the development of Nigeria,” he said.

The aide cautioned against spreading unverified information, noting that such rumors could distress family members, associates, and the public.

He appealed to Nigerians to verify information from credible sources before sharing it, especially on social media, and urged citizens to act responsibly to curb the menace of fake news.

Reports claiming the former Nigerian Head of State had died had sparked widespread confusion on social media over the weekend.

Despite the absence of official confirmation, many users shared messages of condolence, highlighting the speed at which unverified news can spread online.

Continue Reading

News

FCT poll: INEC Begins Online Accreditation For Journalists

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission has commenced online accreditation for journalists and media organisations that intend to cover the 2026 Federal Capital Territory Area Council Election scheduled for Saturday, February 21, 2026.

In a notice released on Monday, the commission announced that the accreditation exercise is open to interested media organisations seeking to deploy journalists for election coverage.

According to the commission, “INEC has commenced online accreditation for journalists and media organisations intending to cover the FCT Area Council Election scheduled to hold on Saturday, 21st February, 2026.”

INEC stated that applications must be submitted through its official media accreditation portal at https://imap.inecnigeria.org

The announcement disclosed that it will be opened today, December 15, 2025, and will close on Sunday, February 8, 2026.

The commission stressed that applications submitted after the deadline will not be considered, noting that “Late submission shall not be entertaine

d as the portal will automatically shut down at midnight 12:00am (Midnight) on Sunday, 8th February, 2026.”

INEC further warned that “There will be no extension of time.”

INEC advised media organisations requiring further information on the accreditation process to contact the commission via the designated phone numbers, 07088844564 or 08032861058.

Candidates from 17 political parties are vying for 68 seats in the 2026 Area Council election. The figure, which includes six chairmanship and 62 councillorship positions across the six area councils- Abuja Municipal, Bwari, Gwagwalada, Kuje, Kwali, and Abaji.

Campaign activities are currently ongoing.

 

Continue Reading

Trending