Connect with us

News

Police To Prosecute Three Ghanaians For Abuja Land Forgery

Published

on

Police To Prosecute Three Ghanaians For Abuja Land Forgery

The Nigeria Police Force (NPF) says it will prosecute three Ghanaian businessmen over alleged forgery and impersonation in the matter pertaining to the dispute of River Park Estate in Lugbe, Abuja.

A statement on Friday by Muyiwa Adejobi, the force spokesperson, named the Ghanaian suspects as Samuel Esson Jonah, Kojo Mensah Ansah, and Victor Quainoo, with Abu Arome identified as their Nigerian accomplice.

The dispute involves contested ownership and control of land assets between Jonah Capital Nigeria Limited and Houses for Africa Nigeria Limited.

According to the police, the suspects attempted to fraudulently assume control of Jonah Capital’s interests in Houses for Africa and River Park Estate.

“In-depth investigations revealed that the accused had illegally increased the company’s share capital and allocated 99 million shares to themselves using falsified documents and forged signatures, also falsely presenting themselves as Nigerian citizens to the Corporate Affairs Commission (CAC) to facilitate their fraudulent activities,” the statement reads.

“Contrary to claims in some media circles, the suspects have not been exonerated by any panel of the Nigeria Police.

“Despite multiple invitations which they have refused to honor, they have instead resulted in launching smear campaigns against the person and office of the Inspector-General of Police, the Nigeria Police Force and the investigating officers, and also filing baseless legal actions against the Police Force.

“The Ghanaian High Commission has been notified in line with diplomatic protocols and the Police Force will now proceed with prosecution of the suspects for offenses bothering on corporate fraud, forgery, criminal conspiracy, impersonation, and obstruction of justice.”

THE EARLIER SUIT

The suspects had filed a suit at the federal high court in Abuja against the NPF over alleged intimidation and illegal arrest in the land dispute matter.

Other defendants were the NPF, Akin Fakorede, head of the IGP monitoring unit; Ajao Saka Adewale, FCT commissioner of police; as well as the IGP monitoring unit and the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC).

Also listed as defendants were three EFCC officials — Michael Wetkas, Enice Vou Dalyop, and Kabiru Baba.

The plaintiffs asked the court to restrain the police and EFCC from re-arresting, inviting, or detaining them, arguing that the matter is civil in nature and should not attract criminal investigation.

They also claimed that existing civil suits on the disputed land are already before the courts and requested the release of the findings of a special investigative panel set up by the police to probe the matter.

Thecable.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has sentenced the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Naija News reports that Justice had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts levelled against him by the Federal Government.

The judge sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment for count 1, 2, 4,5, and 6.

He also sentenced Kanu to 20 years forcount 3 without option of fine.

The Judge sentenced Kanu to five years in prison on count seven without option of fine.

Justice Omotosho ruled that he should not be kept in Kuje prison. He forfeited Nnamdi Kanu’s radio transmitter and barred him from access to social media.

More are still coming

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FG Urges Court To Impose Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death sentence on the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, following his conviction on all seven terrorism counts.

The request was made on Thursday by the FG’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), shortly after Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty of all charges preferred against him.

Awomolo, addressing the court after the verdict, argued that the severity of Kanu’s actions merited the maximum penalty under the law.

The senior lawyer insisted that Kanu committed “many illegalities” and should not be treated with leniency.

Awomolo further reminded the court that four of the seven counts on which Kanu was convicted carry the death sentence under Nigeria’s terrorism laws.

He urged Justice Omotosho to take this into account in determining the appropriate punishment.

“It will not be considered justice that he is isolated and punished lightly in a country where we have Boko Haram, ISWAP, Lakurawa, et cetera,” he argued.

According to the prosecution, Kanu’s actions were as destabilising as those of other violent groups and should be treated with equal seriousness.

Awomolo also urged the judge to ensure that Kanu is kept in a secure correctional facility pending the court’s final pronouncement on sentencing.

He stressed the need to prevent any disruptions or security breaches involving the IPOB leader while the sentencing process is underway.

Kanu was earlier found guilty of inciting violence, ordering attacks on security personnel, calling for killings, and issuing threats capable of terrorising the public, all captured in broadcasts tendered as evidence by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

News

Court Finally Delivers Judgement In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has delivered his ruling in the case between the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and the Federal Government.

Naija News reports that the judgement was given in Nnamdi Kanu’s absence after the judge had ordered security operatives to kick him out of the court over his unruly behaviour.

Nnamdi Kanu had earlier stated that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja does not have the jurisdiction to try him.

The separatist, who has been in custody since 2021, faced seven terrorism-related charges bordering on alleged incitement, running an unlawful group, and acts threatening national security.

The IPOB leader contended that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being prosecuted, has been repealed.

He urged the court to strike out the charges, describing them as “disclosing no offence known to law” and therefore invalid.

Kanu also requested that the court nullify the “purported plea of not guilty” entered on his behalf, claiming it was obtained through deception and contrary to a Supreme Court ruling.

He further asked the court to set aside all subsequent proceedings and order his immediate release.

“My contention is very simple: this court lacks jurisdiction to try me,” he said.

Delivering ruling on Thursday, Justice Omotosho ruled that the court has the authority to preside over the Nnamdi Kanu case.

The judge also stated that the matter of extradition has been settled by the Supreme Court, and he ruled against Kanu in this regard.

On the issue of fairness in the hearing for Nnmadi Kanu, Omotosho ruled against the IPOB leader, stating that the court ensured he received a fair hearing.

On the defendant not entering his defence, Justice Omotosho said: “I begged the defendant passionately to enter his defence, but he remained obsolete. That shows that he chose to rest his case on the prosecution. Which is a gamble and a risky action.”

The court found Nnamdi Kanu guilty and convicted him of count 1 in the charges filed against him by the federal government.

The Judge said: “The court will rely on the uncontroverted evidence of the prosecution. This court, therefore, finds that the prosecution has discharged Count 1 beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the defendant (Kanu) is hereby convicted in respect of Count 1.”

More judgement is being read and this report will be updated as it comes in…….

Continue Reading

Trending