Connect with us

News

Mabudeje Family Wins Agbowa-Ikosi Kingship Appeal

Published

on

Mabudeje Family Wins Agbowa-Ikosi Kingship Appeal

The Court of Appeal in Lagos has overturned a previous judgment of the Lagos State High Court and upheld the right of the Mabudeje Royal Family to nominate a candidate for the vacant stool of the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi.

In a judgment delivered on May 30, 2025, the appellate court ruled that the lower court erred in law and failed to properly assess the evidence presented in the long-standing dispute over the traditional leadership of the Agbowa-Ikosi community in Ikosi-Ejinrin LCDA of Lagos State.

In Appeal No: CA/LAG/CV/1104/2023, the panel of justices, led by Justice Ngozika Okaisabor, held that the Mabudeje Royal Family, represented by Prince Babatunde Adenusi and others, had established their entitlement to the kingship based on credible and consistent evidence.

The court found that the High Court was wrong to have recognised the nomination and selection of Prince (Barr.) Owolabi Saheed Momson, who was joined as the 8th defendant in the suit, as the rightful Oba.

Justice Okaisabor, in the lead judgment, noted that a key piece of evidence presented by the claimants, a 2007 meeting of the Oba-in-Council admitted as Exhibit P9, revealed that the Aduloju family had clearly disassociated themselves from the Mabudeje lineage. Quoting from the minutes of the meeting, the court stated: “The 6th Respondent in the said Exhibit P9 denied being member of Mabudeje family and further stated that there is no one in their family who bears such a name.”

The appellate court found this disavowal significant, especially since the lower court had based its findings on a nomination process facilitated by the Aduloju family, which, by their own account, was not part of the Mabudeje ruling house.

Justice Okaisabor concluded that the evidence of the claimants was more coherent and reliable than that of the respondents.

The court also found that the proper legal process for involving the rightful royal family in the nomination had not been followed. Specifically, it determined that no valid communication was made by the authorities to the Mabudeje family inviting them to put forward a nominee.

“The said evidence of Appellants’ PW1… is that the 4th respondent did not write to them but wrote to the Adulojus as Mabudeje family, whereas Adulojus is not Mabudeje family,” the judgment noted.

Based on these findings, the Court of Appeal granted all the principal reliefs sought by the claimants. It issued a declaration affirming the right of the Mabudeje Royal Family to fill the vacant kingship stool and ordered the relevant government and chieftaincy authorities to invite the family to submit a nominee for installation.

“A DECLARATION that the claimants are entitled to the immediate right to fill the vacant stool of the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi in the Ejinrin/Eredo Local Government Development Area of Lagos State.

“AN ORDER compelling the 1st – 5th Defendants to call for the claimants’ nominee for the vacant stool of the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi and install the nominee as the Abowa of Agbowa-Ikosi.”

The judgment was supported by Justices Mohammed Mustapha and Paul Ahmed Bassi, who concurred with the lead decision.

At the hearing of the appeal held on April 7, 2025, the appellants were represented by a legal team led by human rights lawyer Femi Falana, SAN, along with S.O.K. Shillings and Fawaz Odusote. Afees A. Abdullahi, counsel for the 2nd and 3rd respondents, was also in attendance, though none of the respondents filed briefs of argument. The court proceeded to determine the matter solely on the basis of the appellants’ submission.

Guardian.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has sentenced the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Naija News reports that Justice had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts levelled against him by the Federal Government.

The judge sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment for count 1, 2, 4,5, and 6.

He also sentenced Kanu to 20 years forcount 3 without option of fine.

The Judge sentenced Kanu to five years in prison on count seven without option of fine.

Justice Omotosho ruled that he should not be kept in Kuje prison. He forfeited Nnamdi Kanu’s radio transmitter and barred him from access to social media.

More are still coming

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FG Urges Court To Impose Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death sentence on the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, following his conviction on all seven terrorism counts.

The request was made on Thursday by the FG’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), shortly after Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty of all charges preferred against him.

Awomolo, addressing the court after the verdict, argued that the severity of Kanu’s actions merited the maximum penalty under the law.

The senior lawyer insisted that Kanu committed “many illegalities” and should not be treated with leniency.

Awomolo further reminded the court that four of the seven counts on which Kanu was convicted carry the death sentence under Nigeria’s terrorism laws.

He urged Justice Omotosho to take this into account in determining the appropriate punishment.

“It will not be considered justice that he is isolated and punished lightly in a country where we have Boko Haram, ISWAP, Lakurawa, et cetera,” he argued.

According to the prosecution, Kanu’s actions were as destabilising as those of other violent groups and should be treated with equal seriousness.

Awomolo also urged the judge to ensure that Kanu is kept in a secure correctional facility pending the court’s final pronouncement on sentencing.

He stressed the need to prevent any disruptions or security breaches involving the IPOB leader while the sentencing process is underway.

Kanu was earlier found guilty of inciting violence, ordering attacks on security personnel, calling for killings, and issuing threats capable of terrorising the public, all captured in broadcasts tendered as evidence by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

News

Court Finally Delivers Judgement In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has delivered his ruling in the case between the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and the Federal Government.

Naija News reports that the judgement was given in Nnamdi Kanu’s absence after the judge had ordered security operatives to kick him out of the court over his unruly behaviour.

Nnamdi Kanu had earlier stated that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja does not have the jurisdiction to try him.

The separatist, who has been in custody since 2021, faced seven terrorism-related charges bordering on alleged incitement, running an unlawful group, and acts threatening national security.

The IPOB leader contended that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being prosecuted, has been repealed.

He urged the court to strike out the charges, describing them as “disclosing no offence known to law” and therefore invalid.

Kanu also requested that the court nullify the “purported plea of not guilty” entered on his behalf, claiming it was obtained through deception and contrary to a Supreme Court ruling.

He further asked the court to set aside all subsequent proceedings and order his immediate release.

“My contention is very simple: this court lacks jurisdiction to try me,” he said.

Delivering ruling on Thursday, Justice Omotosho ruled that the court has the authority to preside over the Nnamdi Kanu case.

The judge also stated that the matter of extradition has been settled by the Supreme Court, and he ruled against Kanu in this regard.

On the issue of fairness in the hearing for Nnmadi Kanu, Omotosho ruled against the IPOB leader, stating that the court ensured he received a fair hearing.

On the defendant not entering his defence, Justice Omotosho said: “I begged the defendant passionately to enter his defence, but he remained obsolete. That shows that he chose to rest his case on the prosecution. Which is a gamble and a risky action.”

The court found Nnamdi Kanu guilty and convicted him of count 1 in the charges filed against him by the federal government.

The Judge said: “The court will rely on the uncontroverted evidence of the prosecution. This court, therefore, finds that the prosecution has discharged Count 1 beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the defendant (Kanu) is hereby convicted in respect of Count 1.”

More judgement is being read and this report will be updated as it comes in…….

Continue Reading

Trending