Connect with us

News

Businessman Denies NBA’s Assault, Illegal Detention Claims

Published

on

Businessman Denies NBA's Assault, Illegal Detention Claims

A 55-year-old businessman, Williams Raymond, has denied assaulting a lawyer, Ajiki John Boluwaji, or illegally detaining one of his employees, Lekan Adewole, over the disappearance of his 17-year-old son, Adam, who has been missing for nearly two weeks.

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), Gwagwalada Branch, had alleged in an online report that Raymond sponsored an attack on Boluwaji when the lawyer went to serve a demand letter related to the alleged unlawful detention of his client, Adewole.

The incident allegedly occurred on Tuesday, June 17, 2025, between 12:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m. at Gudu Market Junction in the Abuja Municipal Area Council. According to the NBA’s account, Boluwaji was manhandled, forcibly detained, and had his phone seized by the assailants during the encounter.

“The attackers seized Boluwaji’s phone and denied him any opportunity to call for help,” the branch secretary, John Oluwasina Adewakun, said in a public statement.

However, in a chat with journalists, Raymond refuted the claims, insisting that it was Boluwaji who caused a scene at his office at Apo Market Junction in Abuja. He said the lawyer insulted him after he refused to immediately sign the letter, insisting that his own lawyer should first review it.

“He was not looking like a lawyer. In fact, he wore slippers,” Raymond said. “He assaulted a shop owner, Itoro Dominic Robert, who came to calm the situation.”

Raymond also denied that Boluwaji’s phone was seized or that he was prevented from making calls.

He added, “The letter claimed I should pay N100,000 to the lawyer as his fee and another N100,000 to the boy for shoes he allegedly misplaced. I said these claims were false and told him I would wait for my lawyer’s advice. That’s when he became unruly and started calling me unprintable names.”

According to Raymond, the situation escalated outside his office when curious neighbours gathered after hearing the exchange. He explained that his missing son had been left in the care of Adewole and others who were subsequently taken in for police questioning, not on his orders but by police discretion.

“The police said my son still had contact with Adewole. My son is 17 years old and has never slept outside the house before. He went missing after the Sallah celebration,” he explained.

Raymond also claimed that the person who allegedly assaulted the lawyer was a passerby who has since been detained by police. “I don’t even know his name. I don’t understand why the lawyer is trying to implicate me,” he said.

Guardian.ng

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has sentenced the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Naija News reports that Justice had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts levelled against him by the Federal Government.

The judge sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment for count 1, 2, 4,5, and 6.

He also sentenced Kanu to 20 years forcount 3 without option of fine.

The Judge sentenced Kanu to five years in prison on count seven without option of fine.

Justice Omotosho ruled that he should not be kept in Kuje prison. He forfeited Nnamdi Kanu’s radio transmitter and barred him from access to social media.

More are still coming

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FG Urges Court To Impose Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death sentence on the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, following his conviction on all seven terrorism counts.

The request was made on Thursday by the FG’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), shortly after Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty of all charges preferred against him.

Awomolo, addressing the court after the verdict, argued that the severity of Kanu’s actions merited the maximum penalty under the law.

The senior lawyer insisted that Kanu committed “many illegalities” and should not be treated with leniency.

Awomolo further reminded the court that four of the seven counts on which Kanu was convicted carry the death sentence under Nigeria’s terrorism laws.

He urged Justice Omotosho to take this into account in determining the appropriate punishment.

“It will not be considered justice that he is isolated and punished lightly in a country where we have Boko Haram, ISWAP, Lakurawa, et cetera,” he argued.

According to the prosecution, Kanu’s actions were as destabilising as those of other violent groups and should be treated with equal seriousness.

Awomolo also urged the judge to ensure that Kanu is kept in a secure correctional facility pending the court’s final pronouncement on sentencing.

He stressed the need to prevent any disruptions or security breaches involving the IPOB leader while the sentencing process is underway.

Kanu was earlier found guilty of inciting violence, ordering attacks on security personnel, calling for killings, and issuing threats capable of terrorising the public, all captured in broadcasts tendered as evidence by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

News

Court Finally Delivers Judgement In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has delivered his ruling in the case between the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and the Federal Government.

Naija News reports that the judgement was given in Nnamdi Kanu’s absence after the judge had ordered security operatives to kick him out of the court over his unruly behaviour.

Nnamdi Kanu had earlier stated that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja does not have the jurisdiction to try him.

The separatist, who has been in custody since 2021, faced seven terrorism-related charges bordering on alleged incitement, running an unlawful group, and acts threatening national security.

The IPOB leader contended that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being prosecuted, has been repealed.

He urged the court to strike out the charges, describing them as “disclosing no offence known to law” and therefore invalid.

Kanu also requested that the court nullify the “purported plea of not guilty” entered on his behalf, claiming it was obtained through deception and contrary to a Supreme Court ruling.

He further asked the court to set aside all subsequent proceedings and order his immediate release.

“My contention is very simple: this court lacks jurisdiction to try me,” he said.

Delivering ruling on Thursday, Justice Omotosho ruled that the court has the authority to preside over the Nnamdi Kanu case.

The judge also stated that the matter of extradition has been settled by the Supreme Court, and he ruled against Kanu in this regard.

On the issue of fairness in the hearing for Nnmadi Kanu, Omotosho ruled against the IPOB leader, stating that the court ensured he received a fair hearing.

On the defendant not entering his defence, Justice Omotosho said: “I begged the defendant passionately to enter his defence, but he remained obsolete. That shows that he chose to rest his case on the prosecution. Which is a gamble and a risky action.”

The court found Nnamdi Kanu guilty and convicted him of count 1 in the charges filed against him by the federal government.

The Judge said: “The court will rely on the uncontroverted evidence of the prosecution. This court, therefore, finds that the prosecution has discharged Count 1 beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the defendant (Kanu) is hereby convicted in respect of Count 1.”

More judgement is being read and this report will be updated as it comes in…….

Continue Reading

Trending