Connect with us

News

BREAKING: Senator Natasha Must Face Criminal Charges – FG

Published

on

Natasha Speaks Out On Alleged Plot Against Tinubu's Govt

The Office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice has insisted that the defamation charges filed against Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan were properly instituted in line with the provisions of the Penal Code Law of Nigeria and the Constitution.

The AGF’s office stated this in its response to the senator’s preliminary objection to the three-count criminal charge pending before the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) High Court, Maitama, presided over by Justice Chizoba Oji.

The charges against Akpoti-Uduaghan, who represents Kogi Central Senatorial District, stemmed from petitions filed by Senate President Godswill Akpabio and former Kogi State governor, Yahaya Bello, following her public claims that the duo had conspired to assassinate her.

In its counter-affidavit, the AGF’s office maintained that the decision to prosecute the senator was taken after a comprehensive investigation by the Nigeria Police Force, which reviewed all petitions from both the complainants and the defendant.

“The three counts were preferred against the defendant pursuant to the Penal Code Law of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and in the bona fide exercise of the prosecutorial powers of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation as guaranteed under the Constitution,” the prosecution stated.

It further argued that the senator’s actions contravened provisions of the law, stressing that the case was filed “in the public interest, the interest of justice, and to prevent abuse of legal process.”

According to the AGF’s office, the charges were neither politically motivated nor an abuse of prosecutorial power.

“The criminal charge against the defendant arose from the comprehensive and conclusive investigation of the case, including all petitions and parties involved, by the Nigeria Police Force.”

“The charge against the defendant is consistent with extant laws and does not constitute an abuse of the legal or prosecutorial powers of the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation,” the document read.

At the last sitting on September 23, defence counsel Ehighioge West-Idahosa (SAN) had filed a preliminary objection challenging the validity of the charges.

He argued that the AGF’s office had overreached its constitutional powers, describing the prosecution as an abuse of process.

According to him, the objection was not contesting the facts of the case but rather the legality and jurisdictional competence of the AGF to initiate such charges.

The objection, filed on September 18, was yet to receive a response from the prosecution at the time of the previous hearing.

When the matter came up on Monday, prosecuting counsel David Kaswe informed the court that although the case was slated for hearing, the prosecution’s counter-affidavit had not been properly served on the defence.

He explained that the document was delivered to an incorrect address and requested a short adjournment to rectify the error.

“It would not be fair for the prosecution to proceed when the defence has indicated its intention to respond to our counter,” Kaswe told the court.

Responding, West-Idahosa confirmed that the defence team had not been served and would only respond after receiving the document. He also requested a longer adjournment, citing plans by the defence team to attend the International Bar Association (IBA) Conference in Canada.

After listening to both sides, Justice Oji granted the request and adjourned the matter to December 1, 2025, for hearing of the preliminary objection.

The case, marked FCT/HC/CR/297/25, accuses Senator Akpoti-Uduaghan of making harmful and defamatory statements against Akpabio and Bello, including allegations that they plotted to assassinate her and that the Senate President was linked to the death of Miss Iniobong Umoren.

The senator was arraigned on June 19 and pleaded not guilty to all three counts.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

SO SAD:12 Killed As Kano Line Bus Collides With Tanker In Wudil

Published

on

N

No fewer than 12 people have lost their lives in a ghastly motor accident involving a Kano Line passenger bus and a tanker near Darki town in Wudil Local Government Area of Kano State.

Naija News learnt that the tragic incident occurred on Monday, October 27, along the busy Kano–Gombe Road, throwing the state into mourning.

It was reported that the crash happened when a tanker driver, reportedly engaged in a road construction project, made a sudden turn in the middle of the highway.

The Kano-bound passenger bus, unable to avoid the obstruction, rammed into the tanker, leading to multiple fatalities on the spot.

The Director of Kano Line, Alhaji Sa’idu Abdullahi Shu’aibu, confirmed the accident in a statement made available to newsmen, disclosing that the bus was carrying 16 passengers.

“Out of the 16 passengers on board, 12 reportedly died instantly, including two of our drivers, Alhaji Sabo and Alhaji Dan Azumi,” Shu’aibu said.

He added that five others, four women and one man, sustained severe injuries and were rushed to a nearby hospital for urgent medical care.

Describing the incident as a huge loss, Shu’aibu extended condolences to the bereaved families and to Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf of Kano State.

“We are heartbroken by this unfortunate accident. Our prayers are with the victims’ families. May Almighty Allah grant the deceased eternal rest and quick recovery to the injured,” he stated.

The Kano Line boss called for stricter safety measures on highways, particularly around road construction sites.

He stressed the need for improved traffic regulation and driver awareness to prevent avoidable tragedies.

Authorities have since launched an investigation into the cause of the crash to establish liability and forestall future occurrences.

Continue Reading

News

TERRORISM: Drama as Judge Begs Nnamdi Kanu in ‘God’s Name’, Reason Emerges

Published

on

Proceedings in the terrorism trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu took a dramatic turn on Monday, October 27, 2025

Justice James Omotosho begged the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) in God’s name

Legit reports that Kanu, who is facing seven counts of terrorism, had sacked his lawyers to defend himself in court.

Legit journalist Adekunle Dada has over 8 years of experience covering metro, government policy, and international issues

FCT, Abuja – Justice James Omotosho, the judge handling the trial of the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, begged the defendant “in the name of God Almighty to consult properly.” Legit recalls that the IPOB leader had earlier sacked his lawyers and opted to defend himself.

As reported by The Punch, the judge begged Kanu to consult properly before proceeding to defend himself.

Kanu is being prosecuted on seven counts of terrorism before the Federal High Court in Abuja.

Justice Omotosho noted that the IPOB leader needed to consult legal experts because “this is not economics; this is criminal prosecution.”

“I am begging you in the name of God Almighty to consult properly,” the judge pleaded. “I am inclined to granting you the adjournment you seek.”

“I know you are educated, but you are not a lawyer. You need to consult experts in the field. Please make adequate consultation. This is not economics; this is criminal prosecution. Please, my brother, make adequate consultation. Criminal cases are not like other cases. I took the opportunity to explain to the defendant because he is not a lawyer.”

Recall that Nnamdi Kanu again declined to open his defence in court in the terrorism case against him. The leader of the separatist group told the court there was no valid charge against him under any Nigerian law. The IPOB leader urged the court to release him unconditionally or grant him bail.

 

In a previous story, Legit.ng reported that President Bola Tinubu’s Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, expressed his readiness to stand as a witness in Nnamdi Kanu’s terrorism trial.

However, the minister, in an interview on Friday, October 24, gave a condition before he could appear as a witness in the ongoing trial that Nnamdi Kanu had earlier mentioned.

Wike, Minister of Works, David Umahi, two APC governors, and several others, as his witnesses in the terrorism charges against him.

Continue Reading

News

Tinubu vs Sowore: Court Announces Fresh Development

Published

on

The federal high court in Abuja has rescheduled the hearing of the DSS suit against Omoyele Sowore, a journalist and former presidential candidate According to the court, the case was adjourned because the judge was not available for the hearing Sowore is currently facing trial over his claim against President Bola Tinubu on his social media page, Facebook and X (formerly Twitter)

The Federal High Court sitting in Abuja has announced that the hearing of the suit involving 2023 presidential candidate of the African Action Congress, Omoyele Sowore, over his defamation of President Bola Tinubu, will now be heard on Wednesday, November 5.

The hearing of the suit against Sowore and other defendants to enter their pleas was earlier scheduled. However, the court could not proceed with the matter over the absence of Justice Mohammed Umar of the trial court.

Justice Umar, who was the trial judge in the suit, was reportedly having a sitting in another division of the court. The court then announced Sowore for the arraignment of the former presidential candidate, Meta (Facebook) Inc. and X Incorp. (Formerly Twitter), who were listed first and third respondents in the suit.

Vanguard reported that on Tuesday, September 30, the court fixed Monday, October 27, so that Sowore can adequately prepare for his defence. The former presidential candidate is facing a five-count charge. The charge is marked FHC/ABJ/CR/484/2025, was dated September 16.

The Department of State Services (DSS), in the name of the federal government, sued Sowore, Meta (Facebook) Inc. and X Incorp. (Formerly Twitter), listed as 1st to 3rd defendants respectively.

The publisher of the Sahara Reporters was accused of making a false claim against President Tinubu and referred to him as “a criminal” on his Facebook and X accounts.

This came days after the secret police made an earlier request over an alleged defamatory post Sowore shared on his Facebook and X pages to be taken down. In the charge, the federal government accused Sowore of acting against the provisions of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc) Amendment Act, 2024.

Sowore has consistently been in the news against the government with different protests and agitations. The recent such activity was his agitation for the release of the embattled leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, who is facing terrorism charges in court.

He was arrested and detained over the protest for disobeying a court order. However, he was soon granted bail by the court, while his trial continues.

 

Continue Reading

Trending