Connect with us

News

‘Are They Bringing Him Back To Continue His Jail Term’ – Godsent

Published

on

Igbo socio-political leaders have raised concerns over the Federal Government’s request to repatriate former Deputy Senate President, Ike Ekweremadu, from the United Kingdom, warning that political motives may drive the move.

Speaking with Sunday Punch, the President of the Igbo National Council, Chilos Godsent, questioned both the timing and the intention behind the request, describing it as potentially “political manipulation” or “vendetta disguised as compassion.”

Godsent expressed worry that the government has not clarified what awaits Ekweremadu if returned to Nigeria.

He said, “There is one thing that is really not clear: are they bringing him back to Nigeria to set him free or bringing him back to put him on trial, or to let him continue his jail term? These things are not really clear.”

He warned that Ekweremadu could be subjected to political retribution.

“People are sceptical that he can be brought back and then, as part of a political vendetta, he might be retried, which is not proper. Why this time, why this election period? It is because they want to use him to play politics,” he added.

The INC President further criticised the Muhammadu Buhari administration, accusing it of abandoning Ekweremadu during his ordeal in the UK.

He said the failure of the Nigerian government to intervene early allowed British authorities to try “a sitting senator of the Federal Republic.”

Godsent, however, commended President Bola Tinubu’s initiative but cautioned against using Ekweremadu’s return as a political bargaining tool.

He warned that doubts remain about the independence of the Nigerian judiciary, raising fears that Ekweremadu could become “a victim of political retribution.”

Similarly, the President of the Ala-Igbo Development Foundation, Prof. Awuzie Unachukwu, questioned the sincerity of the government’s move.

He said, “If it is appreciated that Senator Ekweremadu should come back having paid his dues, why does this same government shy away from releasing Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, who was only asking for self-determination for the Igbos?”

Unachukwu argued that if the request for Ekweremadu’s repatriation is not political, then the continued detention of Kanu must be addressed immediately.

He added that the move may be aimed at mobilizing powerful Igbo figures ahead of the 2027 election cycle.

While commending President Tinubu for initiating steps toward Ekweremadu’s return, Unachukwu insisted that the embattled senator must not be brought home only to face further punishment.

He said, “He shouldn’t be brought back to Nigeria to serve a jail term in this dungeon of a prison. He suffered for his crime enough. If he is coming back to Nigeria, it shouldn’t be for a jail term.”

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has sentenced the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Naija News reports that Justice had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts levelled against him by the Federal Government.

The judge sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment for count 1, 2, 4,5, and 6.

He also sentenced Kanu to 20 years forcount 3 without option of fine.

The Judge sentenced Kanu to five years in prison on count seven without option of fine.

Justice Omotosho ruled that he should not be kept in Kuje prison. He forfeited Nnamdi Kanu’s radio transmitter and barred him from access to social media.

More are still coming

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FG Urges Court To Impose Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death sentence on the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, following his conviction on all seven terrorism counts.

The request was made on Thursday by the FG’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), shortly after Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty of all charges preferred against him.

Awomolo, addressing the court after the verdict, argued that the severity of Kanu’s actions merited the maximum penalty under the law.

The senior lawyer insisted that Kanu committed “many illegalities” and should not be treated with leniency.

Awomolo further reminded the court that four of the seven counts on which Kanu was convicted carry the death sentence under Nigeria’s terrorism laws.

He urged Justice Omotosho to take this into account in determining the appropriate punishment.

“It will not be considered justice that he is isolated and punished lightly in a country where we have Boko Haram, ISWAP, Lakurawa, et cetera,” he argued.

According to the prosecution, Kanu’s actions were as destabilising as those of other violent groups and should be treated with equal seriousness.

Awomolo also urged the judge to ensure that Kanu is kept in a secure correctional facility pending the court’s final pronouncement on sentencing.

He stressed the need to prevent any disruptions or security breaches involving the IPOB leader while the sentencing process is underway.

Kanu was earlier found guilty of inciting violence, ordering attacks on security personnel, calling for killings, and issuing threats capable of terrorising the public, all captured in broadcasts tendered as evidence by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

News

Court Finally Delivers Judgement In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has delivered his ruling in the case between the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and the Federal Government.

Naija News reports that the judgement was given in Nnamdi Kanu’s absence after the judge had ordered security operatives to kick him out of the court over his unruly behaviour.

Nnamdi Kanu had earlier stated that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja does not have the jurisdiction to try him.

The separatist, who has been in custody since 2021, faced seven terrorism-related charges bordering on alleged incitement, running an unlawful group, and acts threatening national security.

The IPOB leader contended that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being prosecuted, has been repealed.

He urged the court to strike out the charges, describing them as “disclosing no offence known to law” and therefore invalid.

Kanu also requested that the court nullify the “purported plea of not guilty” entered on his behalf, claiming it was obtained through deception and contrary to a Supreme Court ruling.

He further asked the court to set aside all subsequent proceedings and order his immediate release.

“My contention is very simple: this court lacks jurisdiction to try me,” he said.

Delivering ruling on Thursday, Justice Omotosho ruled that the court has the authority to preside over the Nnamdi Kanu case.

The judge also stated that the matter of extradition has been settled by the Supreme Court, and he ruled against Kanu in this regard.

On the issue of fairness in the hearing for Nnmadi Kanu, Omotosho ruled against the IPOB leader, stating that the court ensured he received a fair hearing.

On the defendant not entering his defence, Justice Omotosho said: “I begged the defendant passionately to enter his defence, but he remained obsolete. That shows that he chose to rest his case on the prosecution. Which is a gamble and a risky action.”

The court found Nnamdi Kanu guilty and convicted him of count 1 in the charges filed against him by the federal government.

The Judge said: “The court will rely on the uncontroverted evidence of the prosecution. This court, therefore, finds that the prosecution has discharged Count 1 beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the defendant (Kanu) is hereby convicted in respect of Count 1.”

More judgement is being read and this report will be updated as it comes in…….

Continue Reading

Trending