Opinion
I’m A Tech Executive And I’m Afraid Of AI
Andy Kurtzig
Artificial intelligence is evolving at a breakneck pace – but not always to humans’ benefit.
An AI chatbot encourages a teen to kill himself, a lawsuit claims. Another chatbot generates racially offensive book summaries. Yet another allegedly tells a teen to kill his parents over screen time limits. And most recently, it seems that AI forges citations for a Department of Health and Human Services report on children’s health.
Such catastrophic failures will keep happening as long as we allow AI to run unchecked – or worse, use it to push political agendas.
I’ve worked in AI for more than a decade, specifically in the professional services field. I’ve seen the technology evolve from its infancy to today’s billion-dollar gold rush. I’ve also seen the misplaced confidence tech executives and policymakers seem to have when it comes to AI.
A recent study we conducted at Pearl, a generative AI platform powered by professional service experts, found that more than a quarter of parents with kids under 18 say their child uses AI more than five times a day – compared to 13% of Gen Zers and 11% of millennials. Nearly a third of those parents also say their child has been given the wrong answer by AI before, and they’ve had to correct it.
An illustration showing a woman with her hair in a bun, holding a smartphone from which orange flames are emanating towards her face. The background is a bold red, contrasting with the dark silhouette of the woman. This image conveys the intense impact of technology, the addictive nature of digital devices, misinformation or the potential dangers and negative consequences of excessive smartphone usage.
This is a clear indicator that we cannot trust AI. Worse, we seem to have baselessly convinced ourselves that these kinks will sort themselves out with each new AI generation.
This blind faith in AI isn’t just misplaced – it’s dangerous. The legal system is already seeing AI-generated documents filled with fictitious case law. Hospitals are fielding AI-created patient summaries riddled with errors. Financial institutions are using AI to assess creditworthiness, often reinforcing systemic biases that harm marginalized communities.
Companies, meanwhile, are rushing to replace human expertise with AI-driven automation, ignoring the very real risks posed by unchecked AI hallucinations (incorrect or misleading results generated by AI). And it’s getting worse. OpenAI’s recently launched AI models hallucinate more than several of its older ones.
So far, AI companies have shown little to no results when it comes to making AI more accurate. Still, more and more people are using and normalizing AI as a trustworthy source – including our country’s leaders. A 2023 Georgetown study suggests it could take $1 trillion to improve AI’s accuracy by just 10%.
AI companies know their systems aren’t reliable, but instead of fixing the core issue, they slap a band-aid disclaimer on the bottom of responses: “Consult a professional.” A digital get-out-of-jail-free card – or so they think. It’s meant to shift the blame to users, while AI keeps spewing falsehoods. Based on our internal research, over 70% of AI responses to legal, medical and veterinary questions include this cop-out.
So, what’s the alternative? Do we let AI proceed and accept the dangers? We are seeing a mass disregard for subject matter expertise from the very top levels of our government on down. One-third of people already believe AI will replace doctors in the next 10 years, according to a survey we released earlier this year. Nearly half think the same about lawyers.
But the reality is, there’s a reason we trust doctors, lawyers and engineers. They have been trained to navigate complexity, nuance and real-world consequences. AI hasn’t. A chatbot doesn’t understand the emotional weight of a life-altering diagnosis, nor can it argue a complex legal case in court. AI lacks intuition, morality and genuine problem-solving skills that come from human experience.
The path forward isn’t about killing AI – it’s about making it better. That means demanding human oversight and not letting AI operate unchecked. AI can be a powerful tool, but only when it works with people, not in place of them.
If we don’t act now, we risk a future where misinformation, unchecked automation and blind trust in AI endanger lives even more. The technology is advancing whether we like it or not, but we have the power to shape how it integrates into society
Usnews.com
Opinion
“Let President Muhammadu Buhari Rest in Peace” – By Nasir El-Rufai
The recent launch of a book on the life and legacy of our late leader, President Muhammadu Buhari, has stirred deep emotions and renewed divisions among those who once formed his inner circle. Having followed the headlines and images from the event, I felt compelled to make a simple but urgent appeal: let us allow President Buhari to rest in peace.
A careful look at those who dominated the book launch revealed the same factional lines that existed during Buhari’s lifetime. One camp was prominently represented, while others—equally close to the late president—were excluded. This selective engagement compounded by the choice of location of the event were red flags, and raises concerns about whether Buhari’s legacy is now being shaped to serve narrow interests rather than historical truth.
More troubling was the presence of long-time critics of Buhari, some of whom now hold high office, delivering glowing, but clearly faked tributes. These are individuals who once blamed his administration for nearly every challenge facing Nigeria, but who now appear eager to revise history—perhaps to deflect responsibility for present failures.
It was also unsettling to see individuals celebrating Buhari in death who had neither his trust nor his respect in life. President Buhari was a principled man who did not easily forget personal or political disrespect, and he made his preferences clear to those around him.
I have not yet read the book, Soldier to Statesman: The Legacy of Muhammadu Buhari, and it is possible that some media reports lack context. However, many of the so-called revelations attributed to the late president appear one-sided and unfair, especially as he is no longer alive to respond. Explaining the thoughts and motivations of a complex leader through selective anecdotes risks distorting, rather than preserving, his legacy.
President Buhari was far from perfect. Many of us who supported him expected much more from his civilian presidency. However, as someone who worked closely with him in opposition political, and governance roles for over a decade, I believe much of his administration’s shortcomings stemmed from the actions and failures of a powerful inner circle—relatives, advisers, and officials who did not always share his commitment to integrity and public service.
Buhari himself remained, to the end, a man of deep faith, personal discipline, and unquestioned patriotism. Those now invoking his name for self-justification should reflect on whether they can claim the same standards.
My appeal here is simple: to all Nigerians: admirers and critics alike—let President Muhammadu Buhari rest in peace. Let history judge him fairly, without opportunism or revisionism. The truest way to honour him is not through selective storytelling, or attempting to exhibit new-found love, but by upholding the values he embodied: simplicity, integrity, humility, and service to Nigeria with all he had.
May Allah grant him eternal rest.
Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai
Cairo, Egypt
17th December, 2025
Opinion
Ogun 2027: Kings Have Spoken, Yayi Belongs, Let the Campaign Begin
Opinion
Has the South-East Traded Kanu and Obi for Political Access? By Mohammed Bello Doka
When Nnamdi Kanu was handed a life sentence, expectations were clear and historic. Across Nigeria, many anticipated a decisive political reaction from the South-East: emergency meetings, coordinated resistance, forceful statements from governors, and a re-assertion of the region’s long-held grievance narrative.
What followed instead was something far more revealing — a loud, deliberate silence.
No collective pushback by South-East governors.
No political reprisal.
No price imposed on the centre.
And in that silence lies a deeper story — one that goes beyond Nnamdi Kanu alone.
For the first time in Nigeria’s political history, all five South-East governors are aligned — directly or indirectly — with President Bola Tinubu and his re-election project. This is not speculation. Public statements and political signaling from the zone confirm that the governors have closed ranks around Abuja. Some openly endorse Tinubu; others maintain strategic silence while cooperating fully with the centre. Either way, the outcome is the same: regional power has moved away from confrontation to accommodation.
This alignment explains much more than the silence after Kanu’s sentence. It also explains the quiet abandonment of Peter Obi’s presidential ambition by the same elite class that once benefited from his momentum.
For years, the South-East sustained a dual political narrative:
Nnamdi Kanu represented resistance — a symbolic struggle against marginalisation.
Peter Obi represented reform — a constitutional path back to relevance at the centre.
Today, both pillars have been set aside.
Unlike previous moments in history when South-East elites distanced themselves from regional causes out of weakness or isolation, this time is different. This retreat did not happen in defeat. It happened from a position of leverage:
The region had unprecedented national sympathy after 2023.
It commanded a powerful youth-driven political movement.
It had emotional capital across Nigeria and the diaspora.
Yet, despite this strength, the elite chose survival.
South-East governors — the true controllers of the political system — have clearly decided that confrontation carries higher costs than alignment. Federal access, security cooperation, budgetary relevance, and political protection now outweigh symbolic struggles. In plain terms, Kanu became a political risk, Obi an electoral uncertainty.
This raises unavoidable rhetorical questions.
If the South-East remains as marginalised as long argued, why was Kanu’s life sentence not treated as a regional emergency?
If injustice still defines the regional condition, why has no political consequence followed?
Or has political access softened the meaning of marginalisation itself?
Even more unsettling is what this silence suggests about the future.
Will there be consequences from the people?
Governors may control the machinery, but history shows that South-East grassroots sentiment does not always move in sync with elite calculations. Suppressed anger, when ignored, rarely disappears — it mutates.
Has the South-East finally been subdued?
Or is this only a strategic pause — a recalibration before another political rupture?
And perhaps the most dangerous question of all:
What becomes of the Biafra agitation in a post-elite world?
If the political class no longer carries the banner — and the state believes resistance has been neutralised — the struggle may not end. It may simply lose its intermediaries and become harder to predict, harder to control, and more radical in form.
For now, the facts are clear.
South-East elites have chosen power over protest.
Access over agitation.
Survival over symbolism.
Whether the people follow — or resist — that choice will define the region’s political future far more than any endorsement ever could.
And until then, the silence after Kanu’s sentence remains the loudest statement the South-East political class has ever made.
-
Business13 hours agoBREAKING: Petrol Depot Owners Crash Prices To Cheapest; Details Emerge
-
News2 days agoIs It True That Court Is Set To Revisit Kanu’s Case After Pressure From Israel, US? Facts Emerge
-
News2 days agoBuhari’s Ex-Minister Pantami Breaks Silence Over Alleged Wedding Plan With Aisha Buhari
-
Lifestyle1 day agoChimamanda: Heartbreaking Details About What Killed Author’s Late Son Emerge
-
News23 hours ago“Do Not Test Trump’s Resolve”: US Issues Fresh Threat To Nigeria
-
Entertainment18 hours agoSO SAD: Actress and Content Creator Sunshine D!es After Surgery; Details of Last Moment Trends
-
Sports1 day agoAFCON: Nigerian Billionaire Splashes Dollars On Super Eagles
-
Politics44 minutes agoFCT Minister Wike Reacts To Call For Tinubu To Sack Him
