Connect with us

Foreign

Putin Holds Fast on Ukraine Terms, Trump Faces Action

Published

on

Putin Holds Fast on Ukraine Terms, Trump Faces Action

Russia and Ukraine are still as far apart as ever, with the two warring countries unable to make a significant breakthrough in direct talks in Istanbul.

While there was agreement to exchange more prisoners, Moscow and Kyiv remain deeply divided over how to bring the costly and bitter Ukraine war to an end.

Russia has shown itself to be particularly uncompromising, handing Ukrainian negotiators a memorandum re-stating its maximalist, hardline terms which would essentially amount to a Ukrainian surrender.

Expectations were always low for a Kremlin compromise. But Moscow appears to have eliminated any hint of a readiness to soften its demands.

The Russian memorandum again calls on Ukraine to withdraw from four partially occupied regions that Russia has annexed but not captured: a territorial concession that Kyiv has repeatedly rejected.

It says Ukraine must accept strict limits on its armed forces, never join a military alliance, host foreign troops or aquire nuclear weapons. It would be Ukrainian demilitarization in its most hardline form, unpalatable to Ukraine and much of Europe, which sees the country as a barrier against further Russian expansion.

Other Russian demands include the restoration of full diplomatic and economic ties, specifically that no reparations will be demanded by either side and that all Western sanctions on Russia be lifted.

It is a Kremlin wish-list that, while familiar, speaks volumes about how Moscow continues to imagine the future of Ukraine as a subjugated state in the thrall of Russia, with no significant military of its own nor real independence.

This uncompromising position comes despite two important factors which may have given the Kremlin pause.

Firstly, Ukraine has developed the technical capability to strike deep inside Russia, despite its staggering disparity of territory and resources. The stunning drone strikes recently targeting Russian strategic bombers at bases thousands of miles from Ukraine is a powerful illustration of that. Ukraine, it seems, has some cards after all, and is using them effectively.

Secondly – and arguably more dangerously for Moscow – the Kremlin’s latest hardline demands come despite US President Donald Trump’s increasing frustrations with his own Ukraine peace efforts.

Trump has already expressed annoyance with his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, who he said had gone “absolutely MAD” after massive Russian strikes on Ukraine last week.

But now, Trump himself is under pressure as a cornerstone of his second term foreign policy – bringing a rapid end the Ukraine war – looks decidedly shaky.

There are powerful levers to pull if Trump chooses, like increasing US military aid or imposing tough new sanctions, such as those overwhelmingly supported in the US Senate. One of the key backers of a cross-party senate bill that aims to impose “crippling” new measures on Moscow, Senator Richard Blumenthal, accused Russia of “mocking peace efforts” at the Istanbul talks and in a carefully worded post on X accused the Kremlin of “playing Trump and America for fools.”

It is unclear at the moment how the mercurial US president will react, or what – if anything – he will do.

But the outcome of the Ukraine war, specifically the brokering of peace deal to end it, has become inextricably linked with the current administration in the White House.

The fact that Putin has once again dug in his heels and presented an uncompromising response to calls for peace, may now force Trump to act.

Edition.cnn.com

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Foreign

Breaking: US Announces Next Step After Invading Venezuela

Published

on

The United States has said it will be charging Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, the president and first lady of Venezuela, for terrorism and drug offences

Attorney General Pamela Bondi confirmed the development, adding that Maduro and Flores were indicted in the Southern District of New York

President Donald Trump earlier claimed that the US forces captured them in a “large-scale strike” following the US attack on the sovereign country

The United States has announced that Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, would be charged with drug and terrorism offences after President Donald Trump’s claim that the US forces captured them in a “large-scale strike” on Venezuela.

Speaking on the invasion, Attorney General Pamela Bondi confirmed the development, adding that Maduro and Flores were indicted in the Southern District of New York. She added that the Venezuelan was charged with illicit drug importation conspiracy, narco-terrorism conspiracy, conspiracy to possess machine guns and destructive devices, and possession of machine guns and destructive devices, against the United States.

According to Bonde, the mission was “incredible and highly successful”. She expressed appreciation to the US military for carrying out the mission.

Bondi described the mission as “incredible and highly successful” and expressed gratitude to the US military for carrying it out. “They will soon face the full wrath of American justice on American soil in American courts,” she added.

Many Americans have taken to the comment section of her post and expressed their views on the development. Below are some of their comments:

Natalie F Danelishen expressed worries:

“You guys seriously captured and arrested a president in another country before arresting anyone on the Epstein list.”

Shen Shiwei questioned the US’s right to invade another country:

“How could the U.S. legalize its ‘military aggression’ against another sovereign country of Venezuela and its president by labelling it as an “operation”? When did the U.S. domestic law rise above other countries’ domestic laws and international laws?”

“If this proceeds in U.S. courts, it sets a huge precedent, prosecuting a sitting (or recently removed) head of state blurs the line between justice and geopolitics. The real test will be due process and evidence, not the headlines.”

Amy Siskind wrote:

“I’m old enough to remember that we just pardoned and released the former president of Honduras for far worse.”

Sari Beth Rosenberg commented:

“So, what’s the difference between Maduro and the President of Honduras, whom Trump pardoned? You are all so obvious.” Beth questioned the move:

“Is this going to go like the rest of your indictments, where it ends up abandoned, dropped, or dismissed by the court?”

” See the full statement of the Attorney General on X here:

Continue Reading

Foreign

‘Supreme Banditry’: Sheikh Gumi Reacts To Trump’s Arrest Of Venezuelan President

Published

on

Islamic cleric Sheikh Ahmad Gumi has reacted strongly to the reported arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and his wife by former United States President Donald Trump.

Gumi’s reaction came shortly after news of the arrest began to spread. He focused his response on what he described as the abuse of global power.

According to him, powerful nations now act beyond limits and target entire countries, not just individuals.

In a post shared on his Facebook page on Saturday, the cleric described the action in harsh terms.

He wrote, “Supreme banditry doesn’t attack villages, they attack nations and kidnap leaders,” a statement widely seen as a direct swipe at Trump and the United States.

Gumi’s comments quickly drew attention due to his long-standing criticism of Western military and political influence, especially in developing countries.

He has often argued that global powers destabilize weaker nations under the guise of security and justice.

The arrest of Maduro marks a major escalation in the long-running tension between the United States and Venezuela. The Venezuelan leader has been accused by Washington of involvement in international drug trafficking and other transnational crimes. These allegations have been repeatedly denied by Maduro and his allies.

Only months ago, the United States significantly increased the reward offered for information leading to Maduro’s capture.

The bounty was raised to $50 million, making it one of the highest ever placed on a sitting head of state. The move was condemned by several governments and political groups across the world.

Trump, who announced the arrest through his personal platform, presented the action as a major victory against global crime.

However, critics argue that the move undermines international law and national sovereignty.

Continue Reading

Foreign

JUST IN: Russia Reacts To US Military Action In Venezuela

Published

on

Russia has condemned the United States’ military action in Venezuela, saying there was no credible justification for the attack and accusing Washington of allowing “ideological hostility” to override diplomacy.

Venezuela remains Russia’s key ally in South America, although the Kremlin has so far stopped short of pledging direct assistance to Caracas in the event of a conflict with the United States.

“This morning, the United States committed an act of armed aggression against Venezuela. This is deeply troubling and deserves condemnation,” the Russian Foreign Ministry said in a statement.

The ministry added that the reasons advanced to justify the operation were “untenable,” noting that ideological hostility had prevailed over pragmatic, businesslike engagement.

The statement made no reference to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, whom US President Donald Trump claimed was captured during Saturday’s military operation.

“We reaffirm our solidarity with the Venezuelan people,” the ministry said, adding that there were no reports of Russian citizens being harmed in the US strikes.

Continue Reading

Trending