Connect with us

News

Akpabio Speaks On Creation Of Ijebu, Ibadan, Tiga, Toru-Ibe 8 Other New States

Published

on

Tinubu Signs Bills For Gombe Special Needs College, Orthopedic Hospital

Senate President Godswill Akpabio officially reacted to reports making the rounds on social media that it has approved the creation of 12 new states across the country.

There were reports on the Internet about approval of the creation of Ijebu, Ibadan, Tiga, Toru-Ibe 8 Other New States last week, which stated an official gazette detailing the new states and their administrative frameworks.

Speaking on the floor of the senate on Tuesday, July 22, under Order 42 of the Senate Standing Orders, Senator Abdul Ningi (Bauchi Central ) dismissed the report as fake

Akpabio corroborated Ningi, stating emphatically that the senate has not taken any decision on state creation.

His words: “I hope that the way Africans use social media will not break society; that is my only hope. You see, even for appointments to be made, they will go and create fake letterhead paper and write that the person has rejected the appointment.” Akpabio added: “No single state, proposed or otherwise, has been created.

READ ALSO: In another story, 2027 ELECTION: “PRAY FOR PETER OBI,” CLERIC RELEASES FEARFUL PROPHECY [VIDEO] click link to continue reading 

Even if that were to be the case, it would involve all the houses of assemblies in the country. And we must get their two-third concurrence before anything can come back to us. And the two chambers, the house of representatives and senate must also be involved.”

Speaking further, Akpabio said although there are proposals for state creation, “not one has reached a stage where we can even say we have finished zonal or national deliberation and then transmitted to state houses of assembly, and then brought back to the national assembly for deliberations.”

The former Akwa Ibom state governor noted that the processes of making amendments to the Nigerian constitution are “very stringent.”

The alleged newly approved states are:
SOUTH WEST
Ijebu State – Carved out of Ogun State
Ibadan State – Carved out of Oyo State

SOUTH EAST
Anim State – From parts of Anambra and Imo States
Adada State – From Enugu State

SOUTH SOUTH
Toru-Ibe State – Drawn from sections of Ondo, Edo, and Delta States
Obolo State – From Akwa Ibom State

NORTH EAST
Savanna State – From Borno State
Amana State – From Adamawa State

NORTH WEST
Tiga State – From Kano State
Gurara State – From Southern Kaduna

NORTH CENTRAL
Okura State – From Kogi State
Apa State – From Benue State

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: Court Sentences Nnamdi Kanu To Life Imprisonment

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has sentenced the leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu.

Naija News reports that Justice had earlier convicted Kanu on all seven counts levelled against him by the Federal Government.

The judge sentenced Kanu to life imprisonment for count 1, 2, 4,5, and 6.

He also sentenced Kanu to 20 years forcount 3 without option of fine.

The Judge sentenced Kanu to five years in prison on count seven without option of fine.

Justice Omotosho ruled that he should not be kept in Kuje prison. He forfeited Nnamdi Kanu’s radio transmitter and barred him from access to social media.

More are still coming

Continue Reading

News

Just In: FG Urges Court To Impose Death Sentence On Nnamdi Kanu

Published

on

The Federal Government has urged the Federal High Court in Abuja to impose the death sentence on the detained leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, following his conviction on all seven terrorism counts.

The request was made on Thursday by the FG’s lead counsel, Chief Adegboyega Awomolo (SAN), shortly after Justice James Omotosho found Kanu guilty of all charges preferred against him.

Awomolo, addressing the court after the verdict, argued that the severity of Kanu’s actions merited the maximum penalty under the law.

The senior lawyer insisted that Kanu committed “many illegalities” and should not be treated with leniency.

Awomolo further reminded the court that four of the seven counts on which Kanu was convicted carry the death sentence under Nigeria’s terrorism laws.

He urged Justice Omotosho to take this into account in determining the appropriate punishment.

“It will not be considered justice that he is isolated and punished lightly in a country where we have Boko Haram, ISWAP, Lakurawa, et cetera,” he argued.

According to the prosecution, Kanu’s actions were as destabilising as those of other violent groups and should be treated with equal seriousness.

Awomolo also urged the judge to ensure that Kanu is kept in a secure correctional facility pending the court’s final pronouncement on sentencing.

He stressed the need to prevent any disruptions or security breaches involving the IPOB leader while the sentencing process is underway.

Kanu was earlier found guilty of inciting violence, ordering attacks on security personnel, calling for killings, and issuing threats capable of terrorising the public, all captured in broadcasts tendered as evidence by the prosecution.

Continue Reading

News

Court Finally Delivers Judgement In Nnamdi Kanu’s Terrorism Case

Published

on

Justice James Omotosho of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has delivered his ruling in the case between the detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, and the Federal Government.

Naija News reports that the judgement was given in Nnamdi Kanu’s absence after the judge had ordered security operatives to kick him out of the court over his unruly behaviour.

Nnamdi Kanu had earlier stated that the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja does not have the jurisdiction to try him.

The separatist, who has been in custody since 2021, faced seven terrorism-related charges bordering on alleged incitement, running an unlawful group, and acts threatening national security.

The IPOB leader contended that the Terrorism Prevention and Prohibition Act, under which he is being prosecuted, has been repealed.

He urged the court to strike out the charges, describing them as “disclosing no offence known to law” and therefore invalid.

Kanu also requested that the court nullify the “purported plea of not guilty” entered on his behalf, claiming it was obtained through deception and contrary to a Supreme Court ruling.

He further asked the court to set aside all subsequent proceedings and order his immediate release.

“My contention is very simple: this court lacks jurisdiction to try me,” he said.

Delivering ruling on Thursday, Justice Omotosho ruled that the court has the authority to preside over the Nnamdi Kanu case.

The judge also stated that the matter of extradition has been settled by the Supreme Court, and he ruled against Kanu in this regard.

On the issue of fairness in the hearing for Nnmadi Kanu, Omotosho ruled against the IPOB leader, stating that the court ensured he received a fair hearing.

On the defendant not entering his defence, Justice Omotosho said: “I begged the defendant passionately to enter his defence, but he remained obsolete. That shows that he chose to rest his case on the prosecution. Which is a gamble and a risky action.”

The court found Nnamdi Kanu guilty and convicted him of count 1 in the charges filed against him by the federal government.

The Judge said: “The court will rely on the uncontroverted evidence of the prosecution. This court, therefore, finds that the prosecution has discharged Count 1 beyond reasonable doubt. Consequently, the defendant (Kanu) is hereby convicted in respect of Count 1.”

More judgement is being read and this report will be updated as it comes in…….

Continue Reading

Trending