Business
World Bank unveils $510m deal to boost investments
The World Bank Group, through its private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation, has completed its first securitisation transaction, marking a milestone in the global effort to channel private institutional capital into emerging markets.
In a statement sent to Saturday PUNCH, the lender disclosed that the $510m collateralised loan obligation represents the first tangible step in IFC’s broader strategy to establish an “originate-to-distribute” model for investments in developing economies.
The transaction involves repackaging IFC’s loan portfolio into rated securities, thereby creating a new asset class that meets the risk and return requirements of global institutional investors, including pension funds, insurance companies, and asset managers.
According to IFC, this approach is expected to unlock access to the world’s largest pools of capital while freeing up its balance sheet to finance additional projects across developing countries.
World Bank Group President, Ajay Banga, said the initiative underscores the institution’s ambition to mobilise private investment at scale, describing it as crucial for long-term economic transformation.
“Mobilising private investment at scale is essential to creating the jobs that give people a ladder out of poverty and begin the journey of changing a family’s trajectory for generations,” Banga said.
“This is step one in an originate-to-distribute strategy that holds significant potential to attract private capital at scale. It also frees up our balance sheet so we can support more countries and more private-sector players. The opportunity and the need are much larger, and so is our ambition.”

The deal has already attracted significant interest from investors and was listed on the London Stock Exchange. It features a $320m senior tranche purchased by private investors, a $130m mezzanine tranche insured by a consortium of credit insurers, and a $60m equity tranche.
Goldman Sachs acted as the arranger for the transaction, which is expected to serve as a scalable and replicable model for future issuances. The World Bank Group said it would continue launching regular issuances under this framework, reinforcing its commitment to building a sustainable pipeline for private-sector participation in development finance.
The structure of the deal is designed to address two critical challenges facing development financing. Firstly, it creates a vehicle that gives institutional investors exposure to emerging market credit opportunities that are typically out of their reach. Secondly, it enables the IFC to recycle capital and expand its lending to high-impact projects in countries most in need of support.
The originate-to-distribute approach was one of the key recommendations of the Private Sector Investment Lab, an advisory body established in June 2023. The Lab was tasked with identifying barriers to private-sector investment in emerging markets and designing practical solutions.
By securitising its portfolio, the IFC is demonstrating how innovative financial instruments can bridge the gap between global investors’ appetite for yield and the financing needs of developing nations.
Development experts note that such initiatives are vital for meeting the massive infrastructure, energy, and social investment requirements of low- and middle-income countries. With public funding and traditional aid flows proving insufficient, attracting private capital has become a cornerstone of the World Bank’s strategy under Banga’s leadership.
Analysts believe the success of this transaction will encourage similar models across other development finance institutions, setting the stage for a broader mobilisation of private capital into regions often overlooked by mainstream markets.
For the World Bank Group, this pioneering securitisation is not only a financial innovation but also a signal of its evolving role—transitioning from being just a lender to becoming a catalyst for large-scale investment flows into developing economies.
Business
THE BAD LOANS THAT HAUNT ABIODUN ODUBOLA Ex-Chief Risk Officer and FirstBank’s Bad-Loan Scandal

There is something profoundly ironic about a man returning to narrate the history of an institution whose most troubled chapters unfolded while he occupied one of its most consequential offices. History, after all, is not an accommodating mistress. It does not surrender its memory to the convenience of those who wish to revise it, nor does it permit yesterday’s custodians to become today’s critics without occasionally demanding an account of their own stewardship. For Abiodun Odubola, former Executive Director and Chief Risk Officer of First Bank of Nigeria, that uncomfortable reckoning appears particularly relevant as he reportedly prepares to write about the institution he left in 2016.
The irony is difficult to overlook. For while Odubola may have much to say about FirstBank, the bank’s own financial records have an extraordinary story to tell about the years during which he presided over its risk-management machinery. It is a story written not in the comforting language of corporate reminiscence but in the unforgiving arithmetic of impaired loans, deteriorating credit quality, extraordinary provisions and a financial institution struggling to contain the consequences of exposures that had become deeply problematic.
At the centre of that story stands a former Chief Risk Officer whose professional responsibilities were as enormous as the institution he served.
Odubola was appointed FirstBank’s Chief Risk Officer in 2013 and elevated to its board as Executive Director in January 2014. By then, he was no stranger to the intricacies of credit administration, having previously headed the bank’s Credit Analysis and Processing Department. He understood the workings of its lending machinery, the architecture of credit approvals and the delicate intersection between commercial ambition and prudent risk management. Indeed, his own professional résumé, subsequently published on the website of Letshego Holdings, provides a striking account of the authority he wielded.
According to that document, Odubola exercised overall responsibility for FirstBank’s Risk Management Directorate and a credit portfolio exceeding ₦2 trillion. He possessed an individual credit approval limit of ₦2.5 billion and served on management and board credit committees whose approval limits extended to ₦15 billion and ₦59 billion respectively. These were not the privileges of a ceremonial executive. They placed him within the institutional framework through which substantial lending risks were evaluated, monitored and approved, even if final responsibility for particular facilities was shared among different officers and committees.
It is against this background that the deterioration of FirstBank’s loan portfolio assumes an especially troubling significance.

In April 2015, Odubola participated in an investor conference call during which analysts raised concerns about the bank’s exposure to vulnerable sectors of the economy, particularly oil and gas. Questioned about the possibility of rising non-performing loans, he expressed confidence that the institution’s credit quality would remain broadly manageable, projecting a non-performing loan ratio of between three and five per cent for the year.
It was an assurance that would be overtaken by events with devastating speed.
By December 2015, FBN Holdings’ non-performing loan ratio had surged to 18.1 per cent, compared with just 2.9 per cent a year earlier. In monetary terms, non-performing loans climbed from approximately ₦64.8 billion in 2014 to a staggering ₦353.5 billion in 2015. Impairment charges rose from ₦25.9 billion to ₦119.3 billion, while the group’s profit before tax collapsed from ₦94.1 billion to ₦21.5 billion.
The figures were startling, not merely because of their magnitude, but because they revealed just how far the institution’s actual credit experience had departed from the expectations publicly articulated by its chief risk executive.
Certainly, Nigeria’s economic circumstances were becoming increasingly hostile. Declining crude oil prices, the depreciation of the naira and weakening corporate cash flows inflicted considerable damage on borrowers across the banking industry. Yet economic turbulence alone could not explain away every question about FirstBank’s exposure concentration, underwriting discipline and the effectiveness of its internal safeguards.
In June 2016, Standard & Poor’s offered a particularly sobering assessment, identifying weaknesses in the bank’s underwriting standards and lapses in risk management. The international ratings agency disclosed that FirstBank’s 20 largest loans accounted for 43.5 per cent of its total loan portfolio at the end of 2015, while its two largest exposures were already non-performing.
For an institution of FirstBank’s pedigree, such concentration represented an uncomfortable vulnerability. For the executive entrusted with supervising its risk-management structure, it raised questions that cannot reasonably be dismissed as mere historical inconveniences.
And then came the departure.
In 2016, FBN Holdings publicly announced that Odubola would retire as Executive Director and Chief Risk Officer, effective June 30, ostensibly to pursue personal interests. The announcement carried the customary courtesies of corporate separation.
But an account provided to this publication, from someone claiming direct knowledge of the circumstances, disputes the suggestion that his departure was entirely voluntary. According to that account, Odubola was effectively dismissed amid concerns surrounding the bank’s deteriorating credit portfolio. Although this account has not been independently corroborated by dismissal records, and the bank’s official position remains that he retired, the circumstances of the transition warrant closer examination.
Particularly revealing is the language of FirstBank’s own financial disclosures. In its 2015 annual report, FBN Holdings acknowledged serious shortcomings in its risk-management performance and disclosed that a critical review of the culture and practices of the risk-management function had been undertaken. The group also announced structural changes intended to improve underwriting practices and rebuild a more resilient loan portfolio under new leadership.
Those were not casual observations. They were admissions by an institution confronting deep-seated weaknesses in one of the most sensitive areas of its operations.
The task of strengthening that architecture subsequently fell to a new generation of risk-management leadership, including Olusegun Alebiosu, who joined FirstBank as Chief Risk Officer in September 2016. By the end of that year, non-performing loans had risen further, with the ratio reaching 24.4 per cent, underscoring the scale of the legacy challenges confronting the bank.
Years later, FirstBank would publicly acknowledge significant improvements in credit underwriting, loan recoveries and the reduction of non-performing exposures under the restructured risk-management directorate. Such progress did not occur in a vacuum. It reflected the institution’s sustained effort to repair weaknesses exposed during an exceptionally difficult chapter of its corporate history.
All of which makes the prospect of Odubola writing about FirstBank an intriguing development.
There is nothing inherently objectionable about a former executive seeking to document his professional experiences or offering personal reflections on the institution he once served. Indeed, a properly researched account could provide valuable insight into the decisions, personalities and economic circumstances that shaped FirstBank’s fortunes. But the credibility of such an undertaking would depend considerably on its willingness to confront the difficult questions surrounding the author’s own years in office.
For when a bank’s loan portfolio deteriorates so spectacularly, the responsibility for explaining what went wrong cannot be confined to those who inherited the consequences. It must also engage those who helped oversee the machinery through which the risks were assessed and managed.
Business
Dangote Refinery Announces Fresh Job Vacancies for Nigerians
Dangote Group has announced fresh employment opportunities for qualified candidates across several departments at its refinery site.
The vacancies are listed under Dangote-Refinery as the business unit, with the location stated as Dangote Petrochemicals (DPRP) and the department identified as Refinery Site.
The available positions cover procurement, warehouse management, logistics, supply and material planning, compliance, information technology, sustainability and data analytics.
List of Dangote Refinery jobs The 24 positions advertised on the company’s careers platform are:
Industrial Hygienist
Sanitary Inspector
Employee Relations Specialist

Procurement Contract Specialist
Warehouse Team Lead – PPU
Warehouse Manager – PPU
Head, Supply and Material Planning
Head, Logistics & Road Safety Operations
Sales & Operations Planning Manager (S&OP)
Procurement Supplier Specialist
Compliance and Governance Lead
Contract Management Lead
Risk Management Lead (Supply Chain)
Governance and Compliance Specialist
Procurement Supplier Lead
Transport/Dispatch Manager – PPU
Transport/Dispatch Lead – PPU
System Administrative Officer
ESG & Sustainability Manager
ESG / Sustainability Analyst
Lead, System Administration
ISO Management System Coordinator
Data Analytics/System Analyst
Decarbonization Manager
Requirements for Dangote Refinery jobs
The requirements differ depending on the position, and applicants are expected to check the full job description for their preferred vacancy.
Several of the positions require relevant bachelor’s degrees, HNDs or specialised diplomas in fields such as engineering, supply chain management, logistics, business administration, environmental science, public health, information technology and related disciplines.
Some roles also require or favour professional certifications. Depending on the position, these may include certifications in supply chain management, logistics, quality management, information technology and other relevant professional fields.
Work experience is another major requirement, particularly for senior positions.
The experience requested varies from role to role, with some managerial and leadership positions requiring several years of relevant industry experience.
For example, the Warehouse Team Lead – PPU position requires relevant experience in warehouse, logistics or supply chain operations, while the Warehouse Manager – PPU role requires significantly more experience, including managerial exposure.
Applicants for technology-related positions may also need experience with SAP, ERP systems, databases, system administration, Microsoft Excel, Power BI, data analytics and system integration, depending on the vacancy.
For the ISO Management System Coordinator position, candidates are expected to have relevant academic qualifications and experience with international management standards.
The Sanitary Inspector role has more specialised requirements, including qualifications in sanitary inspection, environmental health or public health technology, with related experience preferred.
How to apply for Dangote Refinery jobs Interested candidates should visit the official Dangote careers platform and select the position that matches their qualifications and experience.
Applicants should carefully read the individual job description because the educational qualifications, professional certifications, technical skills and years of experience differ across the 24 positions.
Business
BREAKING: Again, NNPC Announces New Petrol Price Nationwide
The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) has reduced the pump price of petrol by N5 per litre at its retail outlets in Lagos from N1,360 to N1,355.
Motorists in Lagos and Rivers now pay N1,355 per litre, making them the cheapest locations on NNPC’s updated price list. Abuja buyers are paying N1,370 per litre under the new arrangement.
NNPC petrol prices across Nigeria
Yobe has the highest petrol price at N1,435 per litre, followed by Niger State at N1,433.
Borno, Gombe, Nasarawa and Sokoto are all priced at N1,430 per litre, placing them among the states with the highest fuel prices.
Several south-western states fall within the lower price range. Ogun and Oyo both sit at N1,367, while Osun is priced at N1,358.
Akwa Ibom is at N1,360, just above the Lagos and Rivers rate.

In the south-east, Anambra, Enugu and Imo are each priced at N1,372, with Ebonyi slightly higher at N1,375. Abia is priced at N1,370, the same as Abuja.
Further north, Kaduna is at N1,400, Zamfara at N1,414, while Adamawa, Jigawa, Kebbi, Plateau and Taraba are all priced at N1,420. Bauchi and Kano share a rate of N1,385, while Benue is at N1,410.
In the South-South, Delta is priced at N1,379, Bayelsa and Edo at N1,380, and Cross River at N1,390. Kwara is at N1,375, while Kogi is priced at N1,390. The full breakdown of the new NNPC petrol prices per litre is as follows:
Lagos: N1,355 Rivers: N1,355 Akwa Ibom: N1,360 Osun: N1,358 Ogun: N1,367 Oyo: N1,367 Abia: N1,370 Abuja: N1,370 Anambra: N1,372 Enugu: N1,372 Imo: N1,372 Ebonyi: N1,375 Kwara: N1,375 Ekiti: N1,377 Ondo: N1,377 Delta: N1,379 Bayelsa: N1,380 Edo: N1,380 Bauchi: N1,385 Kano: N1,385 Cross River: N1,390; Kogi: N1,390 Kaduna: N1,400 Benue: N1,410 Zamfara: N1,414 Adamawa: N1,420 Jigawa: N1,420 Kebbi: N1,420 Plateau: N1,420 Taraba: N1,420 Borno: N1,430 Gombe: N1,430 Nasarawa: N1,430 Sokoto: N1,430 Niger: N1,433 Yobe: N1,435
-
Business2 days agoTHE BAD LOANS THAT HAUNT ABIODUN ODUBOLA Ex-Chief Risk Officer and FirstBank’s Bad-Loan Scandal
-
News20 hours agoFull List: 28 States That Approved State Police
-
News19 hours agoJUST IN: Nigerian Gov Approves 13th-Month Bonus
-
Lifestyle2 days agoA Legacy Written in Miles, Sweat and Splendour
