Connect with us

Opinion

Why Ukraine Peace Talks Are Failing

Published

on

Why Ukraine Peace Talks Are Failing

The current process ignores justice, trauma and truth – and risks locking in endless war. 

This month’s peace talks between Russia and Ukraine in Istanbul have once again failed to bring the war any closer to a ceasefire. The only outcome – a limited agreement on prisoner exchanges – underscores a troubling truth: the current negotiation framework is not working.

Meanwhile, military escalation on both sides shows no signs of slowing. In such an atmosphere, diplomacy becomes increasingly difficult. A ceasefire feels out of reach, and uneasy comparisons with the Korean Peninsula’s frozen armistice are beginning to surface – a scenario that would only entrench division, fuel resentment, and leave key territorial issues unresolved.

That is why we must fundamentally rethink how these talks are structured and led. Yes, a full, unconditional 30-day ceasefire – as Ukraine proposed in Istanbul – is the bare minimum needed to create space for diplomacy. Talks must be convened without preconditions, offering all parties a seat at the table on neutral ground.

There is no shortage of thoughtful policy proposals in Western circles outlining feasible paths to peace. We support calls for stronger international engagement, particularly from the United Nations, the United States and the European Union. What is needed now is urgent, coordinated global action – before tit-for-tat escalations spiral even further out of control.

But there is a deeper flaw in the way current negotiations are being facilitated – often by foreign ministers approaching the conflict as a technical problem to be solved: add a concession here, subtract a demand there. Each side calculates whether the outcome adds up in its favour. That arithmetic approach cannot work – not in a conflict defined by trauma, identity, loss and justice.

What continues to be absent from these discussions is any real conversation about justice, accountability and healing. There can be no sustainable peace without a process of transitional justice. As scholars and practitioners have long noted, a frozen conflict without accountability only prolongs suffering and sets the stage for future violence. Likewise, there is too little attention paid to societal trauma – the emotional and psychological toll of war on civilians, soldiers and entire communities.

Too much blood has been shed to exclude these dimensions from the peace process. A negotiation cannot succeed if one side is focused on saving face at the expense of the truth. A durable outcome is only possible when facts are acknowledged – the aggression, the occupation and the suffering of millions.

What is required now is a new kind of diplomacy – one that accounts for the deep trauma of this war. The mood in Ukraine is heavy, haunted by daily reminders of loss: the sirens, the shattered homes, the soldier’s coffin quietly passing by on an otherwise ordinary street. Peace must begin with recognition – not only of legal borders and security guarantees, but of pain.

This is the essential – and too often overlooked – precondition for any meaningful dialogue, in Turkiye or elsewhere. Recognising the human cost is not weakness; it is strength. Without it, any ceasefire will remain fragile, any agreement incomplete.

Peace in Ukraine requires more than a political settlement. It demands social reconciliation – a process as vital as the diplomatic one. History, language, identity: these are not peripheral issues in this war; they are its heart.

That means rethinking everything – who hosts the talks, where they happen, and how they are facilitated. We need less of a closed-door negotiation in Istanbul and more of a public-facing truth and reconciliation process, with real international backing.

It all hinges on who convenes this process, and how. The United States is uniquely positioned to lead, perhaps more effectively than a divided European Union. But recent statements from the Trump camp – seen by many in Ukraine as indifferent or incendiary – have only inflamed tensions. They do more harm than good.

What is needed now is serious, strategic engagement – led by the US, in concert with the EU and UN – that meets this moment with the gravity it demands. This is not a maths problem. It is a matter of justice, healing and human survival.

It is time we approached it that way.

Aljazeera.com

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Opinion

Aregbe Unveils Youth Hub to Support Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda

Published

on

The Special Adviser to the Lagos State Governor on Tourism, Idris Aregbe, has unveiled the Renewed Hope Creative and Innovative Hub to equip young people with skills, entrepreneurship training and digital innovation opportunities.

Speaking at the unveiling, Aregbe said the initiative was designed to bridge the gap between talent and opportunity by providing mentorship, skills acquisition and enterprise development for youths.

According to him, the hub aligns with President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s Renewed Hope Agenda and the Lagos State Government’s THEMES+ agenda by investing in human capital and innovation.

He said “The Renewed Hope Creative and Innovative Hub is built for the young and the vibrant. Through skills acquisition, mentorship, entrepreneurship and digital innovation, we are creating a platform where talent can flourish and young people can become agents of change.”

“Our goal is to equip our youths to become self-reliant, build sustainable livelihoods and contribute meaningfully to the development of Lagos State and Nigeria.” He added.

Aregbe commended President Tinubu for placing young people at the centre of national development and praised Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu and Deputy Governor Dr. Kadri Obafemi Hamzat for their commitment to youth empowerment.

He urged young people across Lagos to take advantage of the opportunities offered by the hub, describing it as “a commitment to empowering the next generation of leaders, innovators and changemakers.” He said.

Continue Reading

Opinion

US Jails Popular Nigerian Politician For 5 Years, Reason Emerges [ICYMI]

Published

on

The United States court has jailed a 42-year-old popular Anambra State politician, Franklin Ikechukwu Nwadialo, for five years in federal prison for orchestrating a romance scam online, where he defrauded victims of over $3.5 million.

This was disclosed in a statement by the US Department of Justice, stating that the sentencing was handed down to him by U.S. District Judge Tiffany M. Cartwright on Monday, June 22, in Washington, adding that the crime was devastating.

Vanguard reported that Nwadialo is the chairman of the Ogbaru Local Government Area of Anambra.

According to the judge, the scam had caused severe financial losses and inflicted deep emotional harm on victims, which included “shame, depression, and isolation from their own family.”

In 2024, when Nwadialo was first arrested, the Anambra state government denied that he had once been appointed by Governor Charles Soludo. Law Mefor, the state’s commissioner for information and public enlightenment, spoke on the development on Saturday, November 9.

However, his sentencing has started generating reactions from Nigerians.

Below are some of their comments:

David Ogba called for sanctity in public offices: “Public office should symbolize trust, not scandal. Cases like this stain Nigeria’s image and deepen public distrust. Accountability must be swift, transparent, and extend beyond prison to public office too.”

Joedinho decried the damage the sentencing of the local government chairman had caused Nigeria: “Every time a public official gets caught in a case like this, people say it’s an isolated incident. At some point, that excuse stops being believable.

A local government chairman involved in a romance scam worth over $3.5 million? If true, that’s the kind of headline that writes its own criticism. Unpopular opinion: the real damage isn’t the money lost.

It’s the damage done to public trust and Nigeria’s reputation whenever a high-profile figure is linked to fraud. The most disturbing part isn’t the sentence. It’s that someone entrusted with public responsibility was allegedly running a scheme that targeted vulnerable people for millions.”

Nwa Regina claimed that Nigeria’s broken electoral system gave room for someone like Nwadialo to hold public office: “These are the criminals we entrust power to through our broken electoral system. Smdh!”

Continue Reading

Opinion

PCMM Appoints Innocent Duru as Regular Pathways, Trafficking in Persons Chairman

Published

on

The Platform for Cooperation on Mixed Migration (PCMM) has appointed Innocent Duru, an Assistant Editor (News) with The Nation Newspaper as the mhairman of its Working Group on Regular Pathways and Trafficking in Persons.

The appointment, which took effect on June 18, 2026, was conveyed in a letter signed by PCMM Director, Aihawu Victor.

According to the organisation, Duru’s appointment is in recognition of his experience, commitment, and contributions to migration discourse, human rights protection, and advocacy for vulnerable persons.

PCMM expressed confidence that his leadership would provide the strategic direction and coordination needed to strengthen the activities of the thematic working group.

“As Chair of the Working Group on Regular Pathways/Trafficking in Persons, your role will include providing strategic leadership and coordination for the activities of the group, facilitating meetings and consultations among members, and supporting PCMM in identifying key issues, gaps, and emerging trends relating to migration and trafficking in persons,” the appointment letter stated.

The organisation outlined several responsibilities for the new chair, including leading the development of policy recommendations, advocacy messages, and position papers; promoting collaboration among civil society organisations, government agencies, development partners, and community actors; and encouraging knowledge-sharing and coordinated responses to migration challenges.

Duru will also be expected to support awareness campaigns on safe, orderly, and regular migration pathways while contributing to efforts aimed at preventing trafficking in persons and protecting survivors.

Other responsibilities include providing periodic updates and reports to PCMM leadership, representing the working group at meetings and advocacy engagements, and upholding the organisation’s values of promoting rights-based and humane responses to mixed migration.

PCMM noted that it expects the working group, under Duru’s leadership, to make significant contributions to the protection of migrants, the promotion of safer migration options, and the fight against human trafficking.

In accepting the appointment, Duru pledged to discharge his responsibilities in line with the vision, values, and objectives of the organisation.

The Platform for Cooperation on Mixed Migration is a multi-stakeholder initiative focused on addressing migration challenges through collaboration, policy engagement, and the promotion of rights-based approaches to migration management and protection.

Continue Reading

Trending