News
One-Party Dominance Threatens Federal System, SANs Warn
The Body of Senior Advocates of Nigeria has warned that Nigeria’s federal system is under serious threat due to the dominance of a single political party, stressing that the judiciary must remain strong where opposition is weak.
BOSAN said the current political landscape has weakened federalism and virtually eliminated effective opposition, thereby placing greater responsibility on the judiciary to protect the constitution and the rule of law.
The body made the remarks in a speech delivered at a special court session marking the ceremonial commencement of the 2025/2026 Legal Year of the Federal High Court and the 41st Annual Judges’ Conference held in Abuja on Monday.
Currently, the All Progressives Congress controls at least 26 of the 36 states in the federation, with opposition parties decrying a tilt toward a one-party state.
In the address, read on its behalf by a former Attorney-General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Chief Kanu Agabi (SAN), BOSAN declared: “When there is no strong opposition, the judiciary must be strong. It must be adept. It must be innovative. It must defend the law and the constitution, and employ every inherent sanction of a court of law.
“The framers of the Constitution would never have entrusted the judiciary with the custody and control of the Constitution, without at the same time, giving it the necessary jurisdictional power to protect it at the time of mindless corruption.
“As I said before, it is midnight. It is you, judges, who will lead in this darkness. At such a time as this, you must be bold and courageous. You must be honest, you must be innovative.”
BOSAN further cautioned against what it described as the criminalisation of politics, urging judges to rise to the challenge of safeguarding constitutionally guaranteed rights
It said: “Criminalisation of politics means that you are the hope of the nation. If the electoral process continues to be dominated by money, if violence and ethnicity continue to prevail, if the checks and balances instituted by law have been eliminated or have ceased to be effective, if all the structures for accountability provided in the constitution are surprisingly ignored, in that case, we need a judiciary that can assert itself.
“Do so now! Do not fear and do not be afraid. If this generation does not appreciate you, generations to come will do so. Generations to come shall look back and wonder how you were able to save a nation so totally lacking in moderation.
“It has been said that as long as the nation is rife with corruption, we should not consider ourselves a democracy.
“The hope of the nation is in the judiciary to remove this cankerworm of corruption so that we can have a genuine democracy. This means that judges must be enlightened. You must spiritualise yourselves. You must be holy.”
The body added that it depended not so much on the priests, pastors, and imams to have a godly society, stressing that the men of God had taught the lessons they ought to teach.
“It remains for you, judges, to punish disobedience. The appropriate use of punishment. You have the means to compel criminals to give up crime.
“That is why it is said that a nation is as good as its judiciary. It is for this reason that some people blame not the politicians, but our judges and magistrates,” the body said.
The Chief Justice of Nigeria, Justice Kudirat Kekere-Ekun, acknowledged that public expectations of the judiciary had risen significantly in recent years, noting that scrutiny had intensified.
She stressed that the judiciary remained the last line of defence for the constitution and the rights it guaranteed.
“In an age where misinformation travels swiftly, and institutional trust is increasingly fragile, we must continually demonstrate, through both conduct and decisions, that justice in Nigeria is anchored firmly on impartiality, transparency, and integrity.
“The Judiciary does not speak through press statements or public commentary; our judgments constitute our voice, and the manner in which we discharge our duties defines the authority and credibility of that voice.
“Beyond the substance of our judgments, the public increasingly measures justice by the discipline of our daily processes.
“Punctuality in sitting, consistency in court schedules, and the courtesy of giving advance notice when a court will not sit are no longer minor administrative matters,” she said.
She emphasised that these expectations were essential expressions of respect for litigants, counsel, and citizens whose time, resources, and confidence are invested in the justice system.
She noted that it would be unrealistic to ignore the fact that public confidence in judicial institutions was fragile, and that perceptions, whether fair or otherwise, carried real consequences.
“Where court processes appear unpredictable, opaque, or inefficient, the credibility of even sound decisions may suffer.
“Restoring confidence is not achieved by rhetoric, but by reliability, professionalism, and visible order in the administration of justice.
“Judicial independence must therefore be upheld, not as an abstract ideal, but as a lived and daily discipline grounded in courage, restraint, and fidelity to the law.
“Independence is not an adornment of democracy; it is its lifeblood. Yet independence, standing alone, is insufficient unless exercised with responsibility and moral clarity,” she added.
She also said that the Bench and the Bar must remain partners in the administration of justice.
“A weak link on either side diminishes the system as a whole. I therefore urge members of the Bar to uphold the highest standards of advocacy, to eschew tactics that frustrate proceedings, and to work constructively with the courts in advancing efficiency, professionalism, and the Rule of Law,” Justice Kekere-Ekun said.
The Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, Justice John T. Tsoho, disclosed that the court disposed of a total of 16,019 cases at the end of the 2023/2024 legal year.
He said 3,113 were civil cases, while 5,818 were criminal matters.
He added that 3,724 motions and 3,374 fundamental human rights cases were filed within the same period.
Justice Tsoho said the annual ceremony served as a reminder of the court’s collective responsibility to uphold the rule of law, administer justice fairly and impartially, and safeguard the rights of citizens.
He further disclosed that, in line with efforts to modernise the judiciary, the Federal High Court had commenced an e-filing system at its Lagos Division, with plans to extend it to all divisions nationwide.
“We are intensifying investment in infrastructural development such as construction of court buildings, judges’ quarters, renovation of courtrooms and staff quarters where needed.
“We also strive to provide essential technological equipment in our courts,” he said.
Justice Tsoho noted that the initiatives were aimed at enhancing service delivery despite limited resources.
The President of the Nigerian Bar Association, Afam Osigwe (SAN), urged the judiciary to guard its independence jealously, noting that its authority rests on public confidence in its neutrality.
While commending the Federal High Court for its resilience and fidelity to the law, he called for continued courage, saying judicial decisions remained vital in shaping governance and ensuring national stability.
News
Security on Edge: US Military Moves Into Nigeria Under Tinubu’s Watch
The US has deployed security agents to Nigeria, focusing on combating terrorism, with increased collaboration between American and Nigerian forces. President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on insurgents amid allegations of religious persecution in Nigeria. Nigeria faces escalating threats from ISIS-linked terrorists and criminal gangs, complicating security efforts in the West African nation.
Washington, USA – The United States (US) has sent a small team of troops to Nigeria, Dagvin Anderson, the general in charge of America’s command for Africa, disclosed on Tuesday, February 3, 2026. As reported by Reuters, this is the first acknowledgement of US forces on the ground since Washington struck Nigeria by air on Christmas Day 2025.
Recall President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on what he described as Islamic State (ISIS) targets in Nigeria in December 2025 and said there could be more US military action there. The US had been conducting surveillance flights over the country from Ghana since at least late November 2025.
Anderson, a top general, stated that the US team was sent after both countries agreed that more needed to be done to combat the terrorist threat in West Africa. Anderson told newsmen during a press briefing on Tuesday, February 3, 3026: “That has led to increased collaboration between our nations to include a small US team that brings some unique capabilities from the United States.” The military expert did not, however, provide further details about the scope and size of their mission.
On his part, Christopher Musa, Nigeria’s minister of defence, confirmed that a team was working in the African nation but did not provide further details. Speaking in the same vein, a former US official disclosed that America’s team appeared to be heavily involved in intelligence gathering and enabling Nigerian forces to strike terrorist-affiliated groups.
Dailyvoice.ng reports that Nigeria has come under intense pressure from Washington to act after President Trump accused the West African nation of failing to protect Christians from Islamist militants operating in the core north. The Nigerian government denies any systematic persecution of Christians, saying it is targeting Islamist fighters and other armed groups that attack both Christian and Muslim civilians.
The US launched “powerful and deadly” strikes against militants linked to the Islamic State group (IS) in north-western Nigeria, where militants have sought to establish a foothold. Trump had earlier designated Nigeria a country of particular concern over alleged Christian genocide.
Trump told Politico he ordered the December 25, 2025, strikes as “a Christmas present”. Camps allegedly run by the terrorist groups in Sokoto State were reportedly hit near the border with Niger, the US military said. Casualty numbers were not clear, but US officials said the terrorists were killed. Yusuf Tuggar, minister of foreign affairs, told the BBC that it was a “joint operation” and had “nothing to do with a particular religion”.
Trump told Politico otherwise in an interview.
The American leader said of the airstrikes:
“They were going to do it earlier. And I said, ‘nope, let’s give a Christmas present.’ They didn’t think that was coming, but we hit them hard. Every camp got decimated.” The US military said an “initial assessment” suggested “multiple” fatalities in Sokoto State. However, a special report by HumAngle in January 2026 described the attack as “performative,” with some local conflict and terrorism experts saying the airstrike largely failed to achieve its publicly stated mission.
Meanwhile, General Anderson said that President Bola Tinubu’s administration is working closely with American forces to eliminate terrorists in the West African region. Anderson, the commander of Africa Command (AFRICOM), said Nigeria was a shining example among other African nations leveraging the US’ sophisticated arsenal and “unique capabilities” in intelligence-gathering to exterminate the Boko Haram and the Islamic State – West Africa Province (ISWAP) insurgents.
The US general made the statement at the press briefing on Tuesday, February 3, 2026, when asked about AFRICOM’s counterterrorism efforts in African partner countries. He noted that the command wanted to expand operations in West Africa, using Nigeria as a case study.
AUDIO FILES available now from today’s virtual press briefing with General Dagvin R.M. Anderson, U.S. Air Force Commander, @USAfricaCommand on AFRICOM priorities on the African continent. #AFHubPress
English:https://t.co/m0Nax6gZV2
French:https://t.co/V8gziCkUD3 pic.twitter.com/MJQpDbMvdF
— US Africa Media Hub (@AfricaMediaHub) February 3, 2026
In the north, Boko Haram, Nigeria’s homegrown armed group, in 2025, mounted a major resurgence. The group took up arms in 2009 to fight Western education and impose its radical version of Islamic law. Meanwhile, criminal groups specialising in kidnapping for ransom and looting, commonly referred to as bandits, are also dominant. In recent months, armed group fighters have repeatedly overrun military outposts, mined roads with bombs and raided civilian communities, raising fears of a possible return to the peak insecurity of a decade ago.
News
REVEALED: Details Of Alleged Terrorism Financing Charge Against Ex AGF Malami
The Department of State Services, DSS, on Tuesday arraigned former Attorney General of the Federation, AGF, Abubakar Malami and his son, Abdulaziz, over alleged terrorism financing, aiding and abetting terrorism, as well as illegal possession of firearms.
Malami and his son were arraigned before Justice Joyce Abdulmalik of the Federal High Court, Abuja.
The ex-AGF and his son pleaded not guilty to the allegations levelled against them by the Nigerian government, through the DSS. Thereafter, the prosecuting counsel, Dr C.S. Eze, applied that both defendants be remanded in DSS custody pending commencement of trial.
Malami’s counsel, S.A. Alua, SAN, made an oral application for bail.
The presiding judge, Justice Joy Abdulmalik, ruled that the court is a court of record and as such can only entertain a written application for bail. The case was adjourned till February 20 for hearing of the bail application and commencement of trial.
Below are the five counts in the charge against ex-AGF Abubakar Malami and his son, Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami:
Count 1
That you, Abubakar Malami of Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, Adult, male, sometime in November, 2022 at Federal Ministry of Justice, Maitama, Abuja, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, did knowingly abet terrorism financing by refusing to prosecute terrorism financiers whose casefiles were brought to your office as the Attorney-General of the Federation, for prosecution, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 26 (2) of Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.
Count 2
That you, Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami of Gesse Phase II, Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, adults, males, sometime in December, 2025, in your residence at Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, did engage in a conduct in preparation to commit act of terrorism by having in your possession and without licence, a Sturm Magnum 17-0101 firearm, Sixteen (16) Redstar AAA 5°20 live rounds of Cartridges and Twenty-Seven (27) expended Redstar AAA 5’20 Cartridges, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 29 of Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022 .
Count 3
That you, Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami, of Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, adults, males, sometime in December, 2025, in your residence at Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, without licence, did have in your possession a Sturm Magnum 17-0101 firearm, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 3 of Firearms Act 2004 and punishable under Section 27 (1) of the same Act.
Count 4
That you, Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami, of Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, adults, males, sometime in December, 2025, in your residence at Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, without licence, did have in your possession sixteen (16) Redstar AAA 5’20 live rounds of cartridges, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 8(1) of Firearms Act 2004 and punishable under Section 27 (1) of the same Act.
Count 5
That you, Abubakar Malami and Abdulaziz Abubakar Malami, of Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, adults, males, sometime in December, 2025, in your residence at Gesse Phase II Area, Birnin Kebbi LGA, Kebbi State, within the jurisdiction of this honourable court, without licence, did have in your possession twenty-seven (27) expended Redstar AAA 5’20 cartridges, and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 8(1) of Firearms Act 2004 and punishable under Section 27 (1) of the same Act.
News
FCT: Court Bars NLC, TUC, Others From Embarking On Planned Protest
Justice Emmanuel Danjuma Sibilim of the National Industrial Court, Abuja, has restrained the Nigerian Labour Congress, NLC, Trade Union Congress, TUC, and three others from embarking on any form of industrial action or protest in the Federal Capital Territory, FCT, Abuja.
The three others restrained by the court on Monday are Comrades Benson Upah, General N.A. Toro, and Stephen Knabayi. Justice Sibilim issued the order following an ex-parte application filed by the Minister of the FCT, Nyesom Wike, and the FCT Administration against the labour unions and their leaders, dated February 2.
The motion, drawn from Suit No: NICN/ABJ/30/26, was filed by Dr. Ogwu James Onoja (SAN) on behalf of the Minister and the FCTA.
After hearing the Claimants, Justice Sibilim granted an interim order restraining the 1st to 5th respondents and their agents or privies from embarking on any strike pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice. The court also directed the 5th to 9th defendants, who are security agencies, to ensure law and order is maintained in the FCT.
The Claimants told the court that the Chairman of the FCT Council of Labour Unions had sent a mobilization message to members and affiliated unions for a mass protest scheduled for February 3, which they said violates previous court orders.
According to the Claimants, following a ruling on January 27, the court’s order was served on the defendants the same day. Despite this, the NLC and TUC issued a statement directing all affiliated unions to intensify and sustain the strike.
The joint statement, signed by both unions, instructed striking workers to resume the strike, citing that the unions’ counsel, Femi Falana (SAN), had filed an appeal against the interlocutory ruling. Following this, JUAC issued a circular directing all employees to continue the strike.
The Claimants argued that this action was aimed at causing a breakdown of law and order in the nation’s capital. Meanwhile, the court has adjourned the matter until February 10 for the hearing of the motion on notice. The FCT Minister and FCTA said the application was predicated on the fact that:
“On January 19, 2026, workers employed by the 2nd Claimant, acting under the aegis of the Joint Unions Action Committee (JUAC), commenced an industrial action by locking entrances to offices and the secretariat of the Federal Capital Territory Administration, including schools and all departments and agencies of the 2nd Claimant, thereby bringing governmental functions and activities to a standstill.”
They noted that being law-abiding, the Claimants instituted action at the National Industrial Court, Abuja, in Suit No: NICN/ABJ/17/2026 between the FCT Minister & Anor v. Rifkatu Iortyer & Anor, wherein the court on January 27, 2026, granted an interlocutory injunction restraining JUAC, its affiliate unions, and employees of the 2nd Claimant from further industrial action and ordered them to resume work pending the substantive suit.
“Immediately the order was served, the 1st Defendant, acting through the 3rd Defendant, issued a directive titled: ‘REINFORCEMENT DIRECTIVE TO ALL AFFILIATE UNIONS IN THE FCT,’ urging workers to resume industrial action.”
“On January 28, 2026, the 1st and 2nd Defendants jointly issued another directive titled: ‘DEFEND YOUR RIGHTS WITH COURAGE AND DIGNITY: WE ARE WITH YOU,’ directing workers to resume industrial action and disregard the National Industrial Court order of January 27, 2026.”
“JUAC, the umbrella body for the employees and affiliate unions, followed these directives and instructed members to resume strike, as documented in the directive dated January 28, 2026, signed by Comrade Abdullahi Umar Saleh, Secretary, JUAC.”
“Acting on these directives, the 5th Defendant, as chairperson of the 1st Defendant FCT Council, issued a directive on January 31, 2026, mobilizing members for a mass protest in the FCT on February 3, 2026, at 7:00 am. This action was intended to cause chaos, disrupt law and order, and prevent the smooth administration of the 2nd Claimant.”
The Claimants expressed apprehension over potential lawlessness, obstruction of vehicular movement, and violation of the rights of residents, including those in the private sector, other government establishments, expatriates, and tourists, prompting them to seek judicial intervention.
-
Politics2 days ago2027: Peter Obi Rejects Vice President Role, Declares Next Political Move
-
Politics2 days agoAPC Break Silence On Shettima’s Appointment As Vice President In 2027
-
Politics24 hours agoBREAKING: Tinubu Reportedly Issues Strong Orders To wike And Fubara
-
Sports2 days agoTransfer: Cristiano Ronaldo blocks moves for Benzema, Kante
-
News2 days agoFCT: Court Bars NLC, TUC, Others From Embarking On Planned Protest
-
Business23 hours ago‘Cooking Gas, Petrol Prices Crash Nationwide’ [DETAILS]
-
Sports2 days agoTransfer: Aribo seals loan move to Leicester City
-
News10 hours agoSecurity on Edge: US Military Moves Into Nigeria Under Tinubu’s Watch
