News
Nnamdi Kanu Submits Fresh Request To Supreme Court On His Trial
The detained leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Nnamdi Kanu, has urged the Supreme Court to review its earlier judgement in the case between him and the federal government of Nigeria.
Daily voice understands Kanu, in a fresh motion filed before the Apex Court, asked the court to review its judgment delivered in the suit between him and the federal government marked (SC/CR/1361/2022) which ordered his retrial.
Kanu asked the court to extend the time within which he may seek leave to apply for an order reviewing the judgment of the Supreme Court delivered on the 18th December 2023.
In his argument, the detained IPOB leader submitted that he just had full access to his complete case file on October 26, 2025, for the first time since his incarceration after taking the decision to represent himself and needs time to review the details.
A copy of the motion reads, ”AN ORDER granting leave to the Applicant to apply for an Order reviewing the aforesaid Judgment of this Honourable Court delivered on the 15th December 2023 in FRN v. Nnamdi Kanu (SC/CR/1361/2022) on the grounds set out in this application.
“AN ORDER extending the time within which the Applicant may file the Application for review of the aforesaid judgment delivered on the 15th December 2023 in FRN v. Nnamdi Kanu (SC/CR/1361/2022) and further deeming the said Application for review as properly filed and served in this suit. And for such further orders as this Honourable Court may deem necessary to make in the circumstances.
The judgment sought to be impugned was delivered on 18 December 2023. By reason of the applicant’s continuous state custody and the prior external conduct of his defence, he was incapacitated from personally reviewing or acting upon the implications of the said judgment until very recently.
On or about 21 October 2025, the Applicant assumed full carriage and control of his case, thereby asserting his constitutional right to self-representation and immediate oversight of his legal cause. On 26 October 2025, he obtained access to his complete case file for the first time since his incarceration.
“Upon a meticulous examination of the record, the Applicant discovered, with profound juridical concern, that the judgment of this Honourable Court of 15 December 2023 was delivered per curiam—having been predicated upon statutes which, at the material time, had ceased to exist in law.
“The decision, though solemn in pronouncement, was therefore made sub silentio of the extant Terroriam (Prevention and Prohibition) Act 2022, and stands in patent violation of Section 36(12) of the Constitution and Section 122 of the Evidence Act 2011.
Upon this discovery, the Applicant acted with utmost dispatch and fidelity to the law, instructing the preparation of a Motion to Set Aside the said judgment, and promptly bringing this companion application for enlargement of time solely to regularize that procedural step.
“The brief interlude between the judgment and the instant application is thus neither wilful nor dilatory but the inevitable consequence of constrained custodial conditions and the subsequent discovery of a jurisdictional aberration only after the applicant personally obtained his record.
“The complaint now raised touches the very root of jurisdiction — a domain to which time and technicality pay no homage. The equitable discretion of this Honourable Court is therefore humbly invited to extend the time ex debito justitiae for the correction of a manifest nullity and the restoration of constitutional order.”
In a supporting affidavit submitted by the youger brother of the IPOB leader, Prince Emmanuel Kanu, the detained Kanu urged the Supreme Court to grant the prayers sought by the IPOB leader.
He said upon taking over his case personally in October 2025, Kanu discovered that the statutes upon which the Supreme Court issued its ruling had been repealed and displaced by subsequent enactment at the time material to the appeal.
He is therefore seeking a fresh motion to set aside the said judgment.
The affidavit read, “That I am the Applicant’s younger brother herein, the Respondent in the substantive Appeal No. SC/CR/1361/2022 — Federal Republic of Nigeria v. Nnamdi Kanu — wherein judgment was delivered by this Honourable Court on 15 December 2023. My brother, the Applicant, is currently in detention and unable to depose to this affidavit.
“That since the delivery of the said judgment, my brother had remained in the custody of the respondent under conditions that severely restricted his access to counsel, to case materials, and to the certified record of proceedings.
That until recently, the prosecution and management of his cause were conducted exclusively through external counsel, and he was neither in possession of the files nor in a position to scrutinize the processes filed on his behalf.
That on or about 21 October 2025, he resolved to personally assume the carriage and control of his case, in order to ensure a thorough personal review and to pursue appropriate redress where
necessary.
“That on 26th October 2025, he was granted access to his complete case file, which he studied line by line. In the course of this examination, he discovered that the judgment of this Honourable Court delivered on 15th December 2023 was, with respect, delivered per incuriam, as it rested upon statutes which had been repealed and displaced by subsequent enactment at the time material to the appeal.
“That upon making this discovery, he immediately resolved to file a Motion to set aside the said judgment, and this present application for extension of time is brought promptly, in good faith.”
News
What Ex- Officer Should Instead Of Seeking Help
The Senior Special Assistant on Public Communications and Social Media to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, Lere Olayinka, has explained the cause of the face-off between his principal and some military officers allegedly involved in land grabbing.
Naija News reports that Wike and some military personnel were involved in a face-off on Tuesday, after the Minister was denied access to the land in contention.
However, during an interview on Channels Television’s Sunrise Daily on Wednesday, Olayinka disclosed that the owner of the land, former Chief of Naval Staff Vice Admiral, Awal Gambo, was scammed by the company that had originally allocated the land.
According to him, the former Naval Staff Vice Admiral, instead of seeking help to resolve the land dispute, resorted to using military force.
He said, “That particular land was allocated to a company in 2007, Santos Estate Limited for park and recreation. The company did not do anything on the land because that place is a parkway, is a walkway, is a road corridor. You don’t build there.
“Then in 2022, the company wrote to the FCTA, the Minister I want approval from you to convert the purpose to commercial, from park, to build park. You know what park is? Not permanent structures. Probably in anticipation of the Minister’s approval for conversion.
“The man decided to partition the land allocated to him for park and recreation, he now partitioned the land and sold to people including the former chief of Naval Staff.
And that is why I want to say here that the former Chief of Naval Staff was scammed, he was scammed. And he has realized that he was scammed. Instead of him to now come out and seek help, he resorted to use military might.
“Now, in 2022, the Minister of FCT declined that request. Did not grant the request for change of land use made by that company. That is where it ended. But he had already sold the land to people. Giving them the impression that the land use will change.”
Olayinka also faulted the military officer who denied Wike access, claiming that he was obeying orders.
He said, “I saw the military officer yesterday telling us that he was acting on order, and I’ve also read online that a military man should obey the last order. And I’ve asked myself, which order? Like the Minister also asked yesterday which order?
“You obeyed the last order, yes but that order has to be lawful, the order has to be reasonable. For instance, if I am a military officer and my superior gives me an order to go and shoot somebody, or let’s say my boss gives me an order to go and rape my daughter, will I obey the order because the order is coming from my superior?
“Or because somebody is dragging a girlfriend with my superior and that superior now sees this person dragging girlfriend with him walking on the street, and he says, shoot this person, because it is an order, I should obey it.
A military man should go and mount guard in a public building under construction, that is the issue here. Building under construction, military men that was reposted to the former Chief of Naval Staff, Vice Admiral Awal Gambo, as his personal security detail, to secure him, to guard him, to protect him. He now chose to make himself vulnerable and send those people on that errand.
“It’s like somebody now there, I have security to protect me. And I now choose to send them to go and be protecting my property that is under construction. I don’t seem to get it.”
News
Military Coup: DSS Files Fresh Charges Against Nigerian
The Department of State Services (DSS) has filed a six-count charge against Innocent Chukwuemeka Onukwume for allegedly advocating for a military coup in the country.
Naija News reports that the DSS, in the charge, filed before the Federal High Court in Abujja, marked: FHC/ABJ/CR/610/2025, said Onukwume, of Umusayo Layout, Oyigbo LGA of Rivers State, allegedly committed the offence in October 2025.
In the charge filed on Tuesday, the DSS stated that by his conduct, Onukwume committed offences contrary to and punishable under Sections 46 A (1) and 59 (1) of the Criminal Code Act.
According to Zagazola Makama, Onukwume would be arraigned before the end of the week.
Some counts in the charge read:
“That you, Innocent Chukwuemeka Onukwume, male, 27 years old of Umusayo Layout, Oyigbo LGA of Rivers State, sometimes in October, 2025 having the intent to cause fear and alarm to the public or to disturbing the public peace, posted a message calling for a coup in Nigeria on your social media account to wit: your verified X account (@theagroman), by which you published the following words: “A coup in Nigeria is needed. Dispose of APC, suspend the Nigeria government and join the AES. That is all we need now.’ You thereby committed an offence punishable under section 59 (1) of the Criminal Code Act, Cap 77, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004.
That you, Innocent Chukwuemeka Onukwume, male, 27 years old of Umusayo Layout, Oyigbo LGA of Rivers State, on or about 15th day of October, 2025 and within the jurisdiction of this honorable court, with intent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, enmity, criminal intimidation, hatred, ill will or needless anxiety, against the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, knowingly and intentionally posted a message on the social media via your verified account, to wit: your verified X account (@theagroman), by which you published the following words: ‘It will happen eventually, Nigerian. The military needs your support now! Only them can save this country. The bastard in Aso Rock has basically sold this country to the West and they run our intelligence apparatus only the military can reset this country.’ You thereby committed an offence Contrary to Section 24 (1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2024 (As Amended).
That you, Innocent Chukwuemeka Onukwume, male, 27 years old of Umusayo Layout, Oyigbo LGA of Rivers State, on or about 15th day of October, 2025 and within the jurisdiction of this honorable court, with intent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, enmity, criminal intimidation, hatred, ill will, or needless anxiety, against the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, knowingly and intentionally posted a message on the social media via your verified account, to wit: your verified X account| (@theagroman), by which you published the following words: “Tinubu has to go and APC has to die for Nigeria to have any semblance of normal life. And if you think your stupid, votes can remove Tinubu. I’m here to tell you that you’re a fool.’ You thereby committed an offence Contrary to Section 24 (1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2024 (As Amended).
That you, Innocent Chukwuemeka Onukwume, male, 27years old of Umusayo Layout, Oyigbo LGA of Rivers State, on or about 15th day of October, 2025 and within the jurisdiction of this honorable court, with intent to cause annoyance, inconvenience, danger, obstruction, insult, enmity, criminal intimidation, hatred, ill will, or needless anxiety, against the government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, knowingly and intentionally posted a message on the social media via your. verified account, to wit: your verified X account (@theagroman), by which you published the following words: “A coup in Nigeria is needed. Dispose of APC, suspend the Nigeria Government and join the AES. That is all we need now.’ You thereby committed an offence Contrary to Section 24 (1) (b) of the Cybercrimes (Prohibition, Prevention, etc.) Act, 2024 (As Amended).”
News
‘Wike Has Disgraced Public Office’ – CSO Knocks FCT Minister Over Clash With Soldiers
A Civil Society Group has slammed the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), Nyesom Wike, over his altercation with a military officer over the demolition of a property belonging to an ex-Chief of Naval Staff.
Naija News reports that the Executive Director of the Civil Society Legislative Advocacy Centre (CISLAC), Auwal Musa Rafsanjani, in an interview with the Daily Trust, asserted that Wike, through his conduct, disgraced public office.
Rafsanjani stated that Wike’s actions portray governance in a negative light and could erode public confidence in government institutions.
He said, “I think Wike has disgraced public office. You cannot come and be doing thuggery as a public official. There should be a civilized way of handling things.
In my opinion, what Wike has done by insulting a Nigerian Army officer is very disrespectful. To be seizing land; I don’t think that is what the president has assigned him to do. We are calling on the president to seriously caution Wike for his behavior because he is ruining the reputation of the office of a minister.
“This is not how to govern. We have had several ministers in Abuja; nobody has done this kind of thing. You can do things in a very civilized way.”
Rafsanjani also referenced allegations by Senator Ireti Kingibe and others that Wike had been reallocating lands to cronies.
According to the civil society advocate, the Minister’s behaviour was unacceptable and called on President Bola Tinubu to caution him.
He added, “Seizing people’s land that they acquired legitimately and allocating it to your own friends, as alleged by the FCT Senator and others, is not good for the government. Therefore, we are calling on Mr. President to caution Wike. The way and manner he carries out his duties is not promoting the good work of the government or the Presidency.
“This work should be done with civility and due process. You cannot come and be doing this garagara to the extent of insulting Army officers who were instructed to be there. They didn’t go by themselves, and they told him that.”
-
Politics2 days agoOsun 2026: Details As Aregbesola Prepares To Lead ADC Statewide Tour
-
News2 days agoBREAKING: Gridlock In Ibadan As Residents Protest Circular Road, Ask Makinde To Return To Original Plan
-
News2 days agoSowore: Lagos CP Issue Fresh Order To Police Officers.
-
News2 days agoJUST IN: Tinubu Govt Announces Fresh Investment Funds For Startups
-
Foreign2 days agoRevoked US Visa: Shehu Sani Tells Nigerians What To Do
-
News2 days agoLagos To File Contempt Charge Against National Assembly For Defying Supreme Court Ruling
-
Lifestyle2 days agoNigeria Is Blessed With One Of The Best Security Infrastructure – Pastor Irene
-
News1 day agoThe first solution To Electoral Reform Is Not The Government- Amaechi
