Business
Airtel And MTN Set For Profit Surge In 2025
With data revenue now accounting for nearly half of total income, MTN Nigeria and Airtel Africa are betting big on bytes over voice.
What used to be a value-added service is now the frontline of growth and margin expansion.
But as tariffs rise, consumer habits shift, and digital infrastructure deepens, one question looms for investors:
Can this shift to data finally lift MTN Nigeria out of its retained losses and help Airtel sustain its dollar dividend payout?
The answers lie in how each telco is leveraging data to transform its financial future. Let us start with MTN Nigeria
MTN Nigeria:
After reporting a staggering N440 billion loss after tax in 2024, largely due to foreign exchange shocks that eroded the bottom line, the telco staged a major turnaround in Q1 2025 with a N133.6 billion profit after tax.
While the stabilization of forex markets and growth in fintech revenue contributed, another catalyst was the explosive growth in data revenue.
In FY 2024, MTN reported N1.59 trillion in data revenue, up 49% year-on-year, making up 47% of total revenue, a major structural shift from the voice-led years.
That momentum continued into Q1 2025, with data revenue of N528.98 billion, accounting for 50% of total revenue for the quarter.
Subscriber metrics reinforce the trend:
- Active data users grew by 7% to 47.7 million.
- Data traffic rose by 42.9% year-on-year.
- Average data usage per subscriber jumped 33.6% to 11.2GB and even higher at 13.2GB in Q4.
According to the company:
“The performance in data revenue was supported by an increase in the number of active data users, increased usage, and enhancements to the quality and coverage of our network.
We continued to drive smartphone penetration and 4G adoption while implementing pricing actions to support revenue growth.”
These pricing actions, in addition to improved user experience, were made possible by MTN’s continued investment in digital infrastructure.
With increased 4G and now early 5G rollout in select zones, data speeds have improved, allowing the company to deepen monetization per megabyte.
So how does this translate to the bottom line?
MTN’s gross margin on data services is significantly higher than on voice, primarily because incremental costs per gigabyte decline as traffic scales. Simply put, once the infrastructure is in place, more usage equals better profitability.
Assuming the Q1 2025 trajectory holds, MTN could post over N2 trillion in data revenue for FY 2025 conservatively.
With EBITDA margin guidance at “at least mid-40%,” that means MTN could pull in N900 billion to N1 trillion in EBITDA from total revenue this year.
Compare that to N769.7 billion EBITDA in FY 2024, and you start to see just how powerful the data engine is.
If depreciation, amortization, and finance costs hold steady, and the naira remains relatively stable, MTN could be looking at full-year net profit north of N400 billion, essentially reversing 2024’s entire loss.
That would not only wipe out retained losses but position the telco to resume dividend payments by 2026 at the latest or even sooner, depending on board decisions.
As of Q1 2025, MTN’s trailing 12-month earnings per share (EPS) now stands at N5.96, pushing its price-to-earnings ratio to 53.56x.
The stock closed at N319.20 on June 5, 2025, reflecting a strong 59.6% year-to-date gain largely on the back of improving investor sentiment and the prospect of profitability recovery.
While challenges remain, FX volatility, infrastructure costs, and capex intensity, the return of profitability suggests that the darkest days may be behind the telco.
Smart investors should watch data on ARPU, user growth, and operating margins in the coming quarters. These are the levers that could flip MTN from survival mode back to a dividend-paying powerhouse.
Airtel Africa
Just like MTN, Airtel Nigeria is leaning on data to drive its business forward. While its headline numbers may look weak due to exchange rate issues, the real picture underneath tells a very different story.
In the year ending March 2025, Airtel Nigeria’s reported revenue dropped by 30% to $1.045 billion, with data income falling 26% to $483 million.
But that’s mostly because of the weaker naira. When you strip out the currency effects and look at its performance in constant terms, revenue rose 36%, and data grew by an impressive 45%.
The company explained it this way: “Our data business remains a key growth engine, supported by more smartphones, wider 4G coverage, and better network capacity.”
Data now makes up 44% of Airtel Nigeria’s total revenue, only slightly lower than 46% the previous year and not far behind MTN Nigeria’s 47% in 2024 and 50% in Q1 2025.
Airtel also saw growth in its customer base. It added about 1.7 million new data users, bringing the total to 29.1 million, while average income per user rose to $1.9 in the last quarter, a sign that more people are using more data and paying a little more for it.
Airtel Africa posted a $328 million profit after tax for FY 2025, a big turnaround from the $89 million loss it recorded the year before.
Can data sustain dividends?
In Nigeria alone, data generated $483 million in FY 2025, down due to exchange losses. But in constant currency, it was a 45% surge, pointing to strong underlying performance.
If this growth trend holds and ARPU rises moderately to $2 by Q4, Airtel Nigeria could generate over $550 million from data in the current financial year, even before factoring in FX gains or tariff increases.
Also, with data traffic climbing, data alone could account for 60–70% of its operating profit by next year. This position allows Airtel to comfortably cover its dividend, even if voice or mobile money slows down.
Indeed, Airtel Africa has already shown this confidence by declaring a $0.04 per share final dividend for FY 2025.
On the Nigerian Exchange, Airtel Africa’s share price stood at N2,372.50 as of June 5, 2025, showing a 10% year-to-date gain. It trades at a moderate price-to-earnings ratio of 26x, compared to MTN Nigeria’s 53.56x.
Nairametrics.com
Business
BREAKING: Petrol Depot Owners Crash Prices To Cheapest; Details Emerge
Petrol prices at Nigerian depots have dropped to their lowest levels in months as intense competition grips the downstream market, following the apparent collapse of the fuel supply agreement between the Dangote Petroleum Refinery and independent marketers.
Fresh findings show that depot owners have slashed ex-depot prices to as low as N710 per litre, a sharp reversal from the steep hikes recorded just weeks earlier.,
In the first week of January 2026, depot owners sharply increased gantry prices after reports emerged that the Dangote Refinery had shut down its petrol production unit for maintenance.
Although the refinery denied the reports, the speculation was enough to jolt the market.
Depot prices surged, and the increases quickly filtered through to filling stations nationwide.
Independent marketers raised gantry prices from around N720 per litre to over N800 per litre, with analysts noting that depot operators were exploiting uncertainty surrounding Africa’s largest refinery.
Depot owners reverse course as competition intensifies
The price spike, however, has proven short-lived.
Checks reveal that depot owners have now reversed course, cutting prices aggressively to stay competitive with Dangote Refinery’s pricing structure, especially as fresh fuel imports enter the Nigerian market.
Data from PetroleumPriceNG shows that several major depots reduced prices significantly in recent days.
As of Sunday, January 11, 2026, ShellPlux sold petrol at N710 per litre, MAO at N715, while A.Y.M.
Falling crude oil prices add more pressure
Energy experts say global oil market dynamics are also contributing to the decline in local petrol prices.
“Crude oil is currently trading between $50 and $60 per barrel in the international market,” energy policy analyst Adeola Yusuf told Legit.ng.
According to him, ongoing geopolitical tensions involving Venezuela and Iran have pushed crude prices lower, with direct implications for refined fuel costs.
“Crude oil is often used as a political tool and is highly sensitive to geopolitical developments. When prices drop, refined product prices usually follow, especially in domestic markets,” Yusuf explained.
Business
Good News: Cooking Gas Prices Drop As LPG Supply Improves Across Nigeria
Prices of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), commonly known as cooking gas, are crashing in several parts of the country as retailers report improved supplies.
According to a market survey by PUNCH, retailers and consumers confirmed that prices have dropped and the product has become more available across the country.
This development follows months of scarcity, which led to a nationwide hike in prices. The scarcity peaked in September 2025.
Consumers in Lagos, Ogun, Oyo and other states confirmed that they purchased cooking gas within the N1,050 to N1,400 range. Some major marketers were also reported to be selling directly to consumers at around N900 per kilogramme.
For many households, the current prices represent a significant improvement from the sharp increases recorded last year, when LPG prices surged after a dispute involving the Dangote refinery and the Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria (PENGASSAN) led to the shutdown of some gas facilities.
Despite the improvement, several consumers said they were hopeful that prices would fall below N1,000 per kilogramme in the new year, arguing that lower costs are critical to promoting clean cooking and reducing reliance on firewood and kerosene.
Speaking on the situation, the National Chairman of the Liquefied Petroleum Gas Retailers branch of the Nigeria Union of Petroleum and Natural Gas Workers (NUPENG), Ayobami Olarinoye, said the LPG market had become relatively stable, with increased supply reaching Lagos.
According to Olarinoye, some off-takers are now receiving gas in Apapa, Lagos, helping to ease availability challenges experienced in previous months.
He explained that retail prices at street-level outlets currently range between N1,300 and N1,400 per kilogramme, noting that costs vary based on neighbourhoods, transportation and logistics.
Olarinoye added that prices could be lower at filling stations and gas plants, where operational and distribution costs are reduced.
He further disclosed that retailers currently purchase LPG from major marketers at prices between N960 and N1,050 per kilogram, depending on the supplier. According to the NUPENG official, sellers offering LPG below N1,000 per kilogramme are typically major dealers who own their own plants and sell directly to end users and do not distribute to retailers.
Business
Electricity Subsidy Nears N2tn Yearly
Amid its struggles to pay the over N4tn debt owed to power generation companies, the Federal Government incurred a total of N1.98tn in electricity subsidy obligations in 12 months, from October 2024 to September 2025.
This was according to the quarterly reports released by the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission. In the fourth quarter of 2024, covering October to December, the electricity subsidy incurred by the government was N471.69bn. It was N536.4bn in the first quarter of 2025 and N514.35bn in the second quarter of last year.
The latest report from NERC released on Tuesday showed that the Federal Government incurred a power subsidy burden of N458.75bn in the third quarter of 2025 as electricity tariffs remained below cost-reflective levels, making a total of N1.98tn in the 12-month period, from October 2024 to September 2025.
NERC stated in its reports that in the absence of cost-reflective tariffs, the government undertook to cover the resultant gap between the cost-reflective and allowed tariff in the form of tariff subsidies.
The PUNCH observed that the subsidy burden remains high despite the Band A tariff adjustments of April 2024. Recall that the Minister of Power, Adebayo Adelabu, has repeatedly pointed out that the electricity subsidy was no longer sustainable, proposing a subsidy arrangement that would cover only the poor.
Experts who spoke with The PUNCH also maintained that the government should find a way out of the burden of electricity subsidy.
NERC stated that the subsidy is applied at source through the DisCos’ payment obligations to the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc. It stated that for ease of administration, the subsidy is only applied to the generation cost payable by DisCos to NBET at source in the form of a DisCo’s Remittance Obligation.
According to the regulator, the DRO represents the total GenCo invoice that is billed to the DisCos by NBET based on what the allowed DisCo tariffs can cover. NERC added that DisCos are still required to fully meet other market invoices.
“DisCos are expected to remit 100 per cent of the invoices received from the MO for transmission and administrative service costs.” It disclosed that the subsidy obligation in Q3 amounted to N458.75bn, though it represented a decline from the previous quarter.
“Due to the absence of cost-reflective tariffs across all DisCos, the government incurred a subsidy obligation of N458.75bn; this represents a N55.59bn reduction in FGN subsidy compared to 2025/Q2 (N514.35bn),” it said.
The commission said the subsidy accounted for over half of total generation invoices, stating, “The subsidy obligation of the government decreased in naira terms and accounted for 58.63 per cent of the total GenCo invoice, which is a 0.97 pp decrease compared to 2025/Q2 when the subsidy accounted for 59.60 per cent of the total GenCo invoice.”
According to NERC, the reduction was driven by lower energy offtake and a marginal decline in generation cost. “This is because while the allowed end-user tariffs remained unchanged across the quarters, there was a 6.08 per cent decrease in energy offtake by the DisCos during the quarter, as well as a reduction in actual generation cost (N/kWh) by 0.98 per cent,” the report added.
The commission noted that the DRO framework replaced the Minimum Remittance Obligation regime in January 2024, and DisCos are expected to pay 100 per cent of their DROs.
Explaining the reason for the policy shift, NERC said, “The transition to the DRO regime was necessitated by the risk of unpaid tariff subsidy debts encumbering the balance sheets of the DisCos, thereby preventing them from raising finance to undertake critical investments in their distribution network.”
Under the framework, the regulator said the Federal Government directly settles the subsidy component of generation costs. Under the DRO framework, NBET directly invoices the portion of GenCo costs not covered by DRO (tariff subsidy) to the Federal Ministry of Finance for immediate settlement.
On payments to NBET, the regulator said DisCos recorded a remittance rate of 95.23 per cent in Q3. The DRO-adjusted invoice from NBET to the DisCos was N323.70bn, while the total remittance made was N308.25bn, according to NERC.
It added, “Comparatively, in 2025/Q2, the DRO-adjusted invoice from NBET to DisCos was N348.66bn, and the total remittance was N333.90bn, which translated to 95.77 per cent remittance performance.”
NERC explained that most DisCos met their obligations in full, as disaggregated remittance performance of the DisCos to NBET in 2025/Q3 shows that all DisCos, except Kano (98.74 per cent), Benin (94.77 per cent), Jos (65.13 per cent), and Kaduna (40.16 per cent), achieved 100 per cent remittance performance.
The commission noted mixed performance among the defaulting DisCos on a quarter-on-quarter basis, adding, “A quarter-on-quarter analysis showed that Jos (+4.29 pp) DisCo recorded an improvement in remittance performance to NBET in 2025/Q3 compared to 2025/Q2, while Benin (-5.23 pp), Kaduna (-1.68 pp) and Kano (-1.26 pp) DisCos recorded decreases in remittance performance.”
The report showed that all other DisCos (Abuja, Eko, Enugu, Ibadan, Ikeja, Port Harcourt, and Yola) maintained 100 per cent remittance to NBET across the quarters.
On remittances to the Market Operator, the regulator said DisCos paid N73.03bn out of N76.77bn invoiced in Q3. This payment translates to 95.13 per cent remittance performance. “This represents a marginal increase when compared to the 95.07 per cent remittance performance recorded in 2025/Q2 when DisCos remitted N65.30bn out of the N68.68bn invoice issued by the MO.”
According to the commission, the disaggregated remittance performance of the DisCos to the MO shows that all the DisCos, except Jos and Kaduna, recorded 100 per cent remittance performance to the MO in the third quarter.
It further stated, “Since January 2025, only Jos and Kaduna DisCos have failed to remit 100 per cent of the MO invoice,” adding that “between 2025/Q2 and 2025/Q3, Jos recorded an increase of 6.72 pp, while Kaduna recorded a decline of 4.29 pp in their remittance performance to MO.”
Operators in the power sector have repeatedly called on the Federal Government to remove the subsidies on electricity so as to end the challenges of liquidity. Since April 2024, customers on Band A have stopped enjoying electricity subsidies.
The report further showed that total generation costs for Q3 would have stood at N782.45bn without government intervention. However, due to the subsidy, the Nigerian Bulk Electricity Trading Plc invoice payable by DisCos fell to N323.70bn.
Despite modest improvements in billing and collection efficiency, electricity distribution companies recorded combined billing losses of N315.17bn between the second and third quarters of 2025, largely due to energy theft, poor metering, and weak commercial controls.
NERC disclosed that DisCos were unable to account for N167.25bn worth of energy received at their trading points in Q2, while billing losses in Q3 stood at N147.92bn. The commission did not state the billing loss figure for the first quarter.
In Q3, the naira value of total energy offtake by all DisCos stood at N854.53bn, while energy billed amounted to N706.61bn, translating to a billing efficiency of 82.69 per cent. Although this represented an improvement of 1.08 percentage points over the 81.61 per cent recorded in Q2, DisCos still suffered significant revenue leakages.
NERC said the losses were driven largely by commercial losses, including energy theft and poor energy accounting, as well as the inability of DisCos to bill energy at the weighted average allowed tariff.
On revenue collection, DisCos generated N570.25bn out of the N706.61bn billed in Q3, resulting in a collection efficiency of 80.70 per cent, up from 76.07 per cent in the previous quarter.
However, the regulator said the weighted average aggregate technical, commercial, and collection loss across all DisCos remained high at 33.27 per cent, exceeding the 2025 MYTO target of 20.54 per cent by 12.73 percentage points.
This translated to a cumulative revenue loss of N108.75bn, despite a 4.65 percentage point improvement from the 37.92 per cent recorded in Q2. Only Eko and Ikeja Electricity Distribution Companies met their ATC&C loss targets during the quarter, while Kaduna DisCo posted the worst performance, recording an actual ATC&C loss of 71.10 per cent against a target of 21.32 per cent.
On market remittances, DisCos were billed a cumulative upstream invoice of N400.48bn in Q3, comprising N323.70bn payable to NBET and N76.77bn for transmission and administrative services owed to the Market Operator.
Out of this amount, DisCos remitted N381.29bn, leaving an outstanding balance of N19.18bn and a remittance performance of 95.21 per cent, slightly below the 95.65 per cent recorded in Q2.
However, the report highlighted weak remittances from international bilateral customers, who paid only $7.13m out of the $18.69m invoiced, representing a 38.09 per cent remittance rate. By contrast, domestic bilateral customers paid N3.19bn out of N3.64bn invoiced, achieving a stronger 87.61 per cent remittance rate.
The convener of PowerUp Nigeria, Adetayo Adegbemle, said the electricity subsidy is no longer sustainable, saying the government ought to have found a way out of the burden. Adegbemle said the subsidy affects the entire value chain as the Federal Government failed to fulfill the subsidy obligations.
“I’ve been pushing that our current subsidy is not sustainable. And that’s because it affects the value chain all the way down. If you are asking me today again what I feel about power subsidy, I have not changed my position on that. Subsidy is not sustainable. The government is supposed to have evolved a way out of it,” he said.
Adegbemle believed that one of the reasons why the government had yet to remove subsidies was because of political considerations, especially the effects of the fuel subsidy removal.
“I believe that there are some political considerations as well. One of them was the shock effect of the removal of the fuel subsidy. And the rising exchange rates. If anything, we all know that the shock effect led to high inflation.
“So, on one hand, I want to believe that that’s one of the reasons why they’ve not removed power subsidies. But then, we have also proposed alternatives for them, one of which is the Power Consumer Assistance Fund that the Electricity Act itself asked them to work on. The Federal Government has not paid these subsidies; if it had paid, we wouldn’t be owing the GenCos. We need to bring manufacturers back to the grid,” he said.
Meanwhile, the Nigeria Electricity Consumers Advocacy Network has described the Federal Government’s service-based tariff policy as a failure, warning that recent electricity tariff adjustments have failed to reduce subsidy payments and instead deepened inefficiencies in the power sector.
Speaking with The PUNCH on Tuesday, the National Secretary of NECAN, Uket Obonga, said the introduction of the Band A tariff regime, which was justified by government officials as a pathway to subsidy reduction, had delivered the opposite outcome.
“I have always called the service-based tariff policy a scam from the beginning, and going by the promise made by the regulator, minister, and the government in introducing the Band A tariff to reduce subsidy, has it been reduced now? The more baffling thing is how revenue collected by the Discos is almost now at par with the amount incurred as electricity subsidy,” Obonga said.
He also expressed concern that revenue collected by electricity distribution companies was now almost at par with the amount the Federal Government was paying as an electricity subsidy, raising questions about the effectiveness of the policy.
“The most baffling thing is how revenue collected by DisCos is almost now at the same level as what the government is incurring as an electricity subsidy,” he said. “That alone shows that the policy and its implementation have failed.”
The consumer advocate accused DisCos of benefiting from poor supply while continuing to collect tariffs from customers. “DisCos are now benefiting from selling darkness to Nigerians and still collecting money,” Obonga said. “They are charging for power that is not supplied. That is the reality.”
He said the original objective of the service-based tariff regime had collapsed because the structure of electricity demand in Nigeria was fundamentally flawed.
“The whole idea behind the service-based tariff was that industrial customers would off-take power, pay commercial rates, and help sustain the industry,” he said. “But today, we don’t have enough industrial customers on the grid. Residential customers cannot pay what is required to sustain the power sector.”
Obonga also faulted the Federal Government’s claim that industrial users were being encouraged back to the national grid, insisting there was no evidence to support such assertions.
“The government is not using data to do its projections,” he said. “Recall that the Minister of Power said the government was working to bring industrial customers back to the grid. How many companies have actually returned? Where is the data?”
According to him, poor supply quality, unreliable power, and high tariffs had made it difficult to convince manufacturers to abandon self-generation. “It is even difficult to convince them to return to the grid,” he said. “Once a company has invested heavily in alternative power, it will not come back easily.”
The NECAN secretary also raised concerns over the Federal Government’s N4tn electricity bond, which was issued to address legacy debts and stabilise the power sector.
“Now the government has come up with a N4tn bond, and it has already been issued,” Obonga said. “What is the result of that bond? It was concluded last year, but there is still no clarity on what it has achieved.”
He expressed doubts over investor appetite for the bond, warning that it may not have attracted the level of investment expected by the government. “I will not be surprised if the bond does not attract the required investment from investors,” he said.
-
Business13 hours agoBREAKING: Petrol Depot Owners Crash Prices To Cheapest; Details Emerge
-
News2 days agoBuhari’s Ex-Minister Pantami Breaks Silence Over Alleged Wedding Plan With Aisha Buhari
-
Lifestyle1 day agoChimamanda: Heartbreaking Details About What Killed Author’s Late Son Emerge
-
News24 hours ago“Do Not Test Trump’s Resolve”: US Issues Fresh Threat To Nigeria
-
Sports2 days agoAFCON: Nigerian Billionaire Splashes Dollars On Super Eagles
-
Entertainment18 hours agoSO SAD: Actress and Content Creator Sunshine D!es After Surgery; Details of Last Moment Trends
-
Politics1 hour agoFCT Minister Wike Reacts To Call For Tinubu To Sack Him
-
News12 hours agoBREAKING: KWAM 1 Writes Ogun Govt, Accuses Fusengbuwa Ruling House of Plot to Exclude Him From Awujale Selection
