Connect with us

News

Tension In APC As NWC Dumps Tinubu’s Governor’s Ticket Control 

Published

on

There is growing tension within the All Progressives Congress (APC) as members of the party’s National Working Committee (NWC) move to resist President Bola Tinubu’s directive granting state governors significant control over party tickets ahead of the primaries.

An uneasy calm pervades the party, with findings indicating a widening rift between the presidency and the APC leadership.

Insiders warn that the directive risks eroding the authority of the party’s central structure, weakening internal democracy and triggering widespread disaffection across states.

The development followed Tinubu’s conferment of powers on the 31 governors under the APC to decide the fate of aspirants in their states ahead of the 2027 general election.

Sources within the NWC told THE WHISTLER that the president’s position, which effectively empowers governors to determine candidates in their states, has sidelined the party leadership and undermined its relevance.

“What the president has done is to remove powers from the party leadership, make them redundant and kill the party,” an NWC member said.

Consequently, multiple sources disclosed that some within the NWC are already weighing options to push back against the directive, including leveraging aggrieved aspirants as a pressure point to force a rethink.

According to one official, “If this stands, the party structure becomes irrelevant. There are already suggestions that those who feel shortchanged should be allowed to ventilate their grievances, even if it unsettles the system, in order to compel a reversal.”

The controversy follows recent remarks by President Tinubu in which he signalled that state governors should take the lead in determining party candidates ahead of the primaries, arguing that they best understand the political dynamics within their states and should therefore guide the process.

The president said this was necessary to preserve the party’s unity and cohesion ahead of the poll in 2027.

However, party insiders insist the pronouncement has had unintended consequences, emboldening state-level power blocs, intensifying rivalries, and triggering open contests for control.

Infighting Spreads Across States

The directive has already fuelled internal battles in several states and widened already existing crises in some states. In Abia State, a fierce supremacy contest has erupted between Deputy Speaker of the House of Representatives, Benjamin Kalu, and former governor, Senator Orji Uzor Kalu, with both men laying claim to presidential backing as the party’s leader in the state.

Abia is led by a governor under the platform of the Labour Party, Dr Alex Otti.

The Deputy Speaker said he has been chosen by Tinubu to lead the APC in the state.

Orji Uzor Kalu – an outspoken campaigner for Tinubu’s second term – has dismissed the claims, insisting that Tinubu chose him to lead the party in the state.

Delta, Nasarawa Crises Deepen

In Delta State, the directive has intensified a brewing contest between Senator Ifeanyi Okowa and former Deputy Senate President Ovie Omo-Agege. Governor Sheriff Oborevwori is reportedly backing Okowa, his predecessor, for a return to the Senate – placing him at odds with Omo-Agege and his loyalists.

A serving commissioner in the state hinted that all three serving senators may fail to secure return tickets, a development that has heightened anxiety and uncertainty among party stakeholders.

Party leaders argue that such outcomes reflect the diminishing role of the NWC in ensuring fairness and balance.

“All the privileges and influence tied to purchasing tickets and conducting primaries have been lost,” an NWC member lamented. “Rather than creating a level playing field, the president has made things difficult by lighting an over-dried grass.”

In Nasarawa State, a similar crisis is unfolding. Governor Abdullahi Sule’s alleged backing of Senator Ahmed Wadada – who only recently defected from the Social Democratic Party (SDP) – has sparked resistance among long-standing party members.

Former Inspector-General of Police, Mohammed Adamu Idris, has rejected the governor’s position and is preparing to challenge the arrangement, with the backing of former governor Tanko Al-Makura, setting the stage for a high-stakes internal showdown.

Cross River, Others on Edge

In Cross River State, tensions are also mounting as founding members of the party push back against recent defectors, insisting they should have priority in the allocation of tickets.

They are reportedly pressuring Governor Bassey Otu to sideline new entrants from the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), a move that could reshape the state’s political calculations.

As a result, figures like Senator Jarigbe Agom are said to be at risk of losing out to former governor Ben Ayade, while several House of Representatives seats – particularly in northern Cross River – are being pencilled in for long-standing party members as compensation.

The development has created palpable tension, with defectors threatening a showdown if denied fair opportunities.

Warning Signs from Party Leadership

The crisis is not limited to a few states. Similar fault lines are reportedly emerging in Rivers, Akwa Ibom, Enugu, Benue, Kwara, Lagos, Ogun and Ondo, raising concerns about a nationwide ripple effect ahead of the primaries.

In Rivers State, the contest which portends danger for the APC is between the Governor, Siminalayi Fubara, and FCT Minister Nyesom Wike. Wike was instrumental to the emergence of Tinubu as president while Fubara is the party leader as a governor in the state.

With the president’s pronouncement, Fubara camp said they have been given the upper hand, which would pit him against Wike.

However, some APC leaders in the state have said there is likely to be a sharing formula where the Governor will concede some candidates to the Wike-led PDP as the APC, including the president, would not allow the APC to lose out completely during the elections in the state.

Meanwhile, in Benue, the power struggle is between Governor Hyacinth Alia and the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, George Akume, which has effectively split the party’s structure in the state and forced elected officials to take sides.

Party sources have expressed worries that the struggle portends danger and could imperil the prospects of the party in 2027.

Similarly, in Plateau State, the Governor, Caleb Mutfwang, who decamped from the PDP to the APC, is seen as an outsider who wants to usurp power and has been told by the old guards that he would have no control over the party tickets despite the president’s directive.

In Akwa Ibom State, the conflict is between the governor and the third most powerful constitutional officer, Senate President Godswill Akpabio.

Akpabio, as the presiding officer of the Senate and the leader of the delegation that went to Tinubu to lobby unsuccessfully for automatic tickets, carries with him the institutional prestige of an office that the President’s directive has now, in effect, subordinated to that of his home-state governor.

That this arrangement has begun to generate friction.

The senators’ meeting with Tinubu, at which the plea for automatic tickets was rebuffed, was led by Akpabio, who returned from that encounter with the knowledge that the President had, in effect, signalled that the governor of Akwa Ibom, not the Senate President, would determine who gets the APC ticket in that state.

A member of the APC National Executive Committee (NEC) warned that the directive could significantly weaken the party’s electoral strength, as aggrieved members may withdraw from mobilisation efforts.

“No one would be interested again in mobilising for the party because they would be aggrieved that they lost out unfairly,” the source said.

He added that “party politics is dicey and tricky and requires careful management, not pronouncements that can unsettle unity and give the opposition the opportunity to capitalise and wreak havoc.”

When contacted, the spokesman of the APC, Felix Morka expressed reservations about making comments that he may be misunderstood. Questions sent to him for further comments were not answered.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

News

BREAKING: INEC Takes Fresh Legal Action Over ADC Deregistration Judgment

Published

on

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has approached the Court of Appeal in Abuja, seeking a stay of execution of the Federal High Court judgment that ordered the deregistration of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and four other political parties.

The affected parties are the Action Peoples Party (APP), Action Alliance (AA), Accord Party (AP), and Zenith Labour Party (ZLP).

At Tuesday’s proceedings before a three-member panel of the appellate court, INEC’s legal team said it was surprised that Justice Peter Lifu delivered the judgment despite an earlier order of the Court of Appeal issued on May 22, which, according to the commission, was meant to halt the delivery of the verdict.

INEC further stated that it was not officially notified of the judgment and only became aware of the ruling through media reports. The commission told the court it was backing the notice of appeal filed by the affected political parties.

“My Lords, we are aware of an order that this court made on May 22, which stopped the delivery of the judgment of the lower court, which was initially reserved for delivery on June 5. We were not aware of any notice from the court regarding the delivery of the judgment. We only saw it as breaking news in the media. We therefore do not oppose the application of the appellant to stay the execution of the judgment.”

Counsel to the parties argued that the Federal High Court acted in disregard of the judicial hierarchy, warning that the judgment could disrupt by-elections scheduled to hold in six states on June 20.

They urged the Court of Appeal to exercise its supervisory powers and immediately suspend the enforcement of the judgment pending the determination of the appeal.

“Sincerely, my Lords, a lot has happened to the judiciary and this profession. What the trial judge did was dare this Court of Appeal by insisting that no one could arrest his judgment, even after his attention was drawn to the stay order from this court.

“The action of the trial judge calls for swift and extraordinary measures from this court. We have come to the stage where this court should press the reset button.

“We are calling on this court to exercise disciplinary jurisdiction under Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, as amended. We urge this court to take disciplinary steps by immediately suspending that judgment.

“This court has the power to protect its own integrity. We pray this court suspends the judgment immediately without further delay.”

The suit that led to the deregistration order was filed by the National Forum of Former Legislators (NFFL), which argued that the five parties failed to satisfy the requirements of Section 225A of the 1999 Constitution and the Electoral Act 2022.

According to the group, political parties must win at least one elective seat or secure a minimum of 25 per cent of votes in at least one state in a presidential election to retain registration.

Continue Reading

News

BREAKING: Gunmen Strike Again, Kill Two Soldiers, 1 Police Officer in Fresh Attack

Published

on

GUNMEN attacked staff quarters of the National Institute for Policy and Strategic Studies (NIPSS), Kuru, Plateau State, in the early hours of Tuesday, June 16, killing three security officers protecting the facility.

The Head of Public Affairs at NIPSS, Osime Samuel, confirmed the attack and death of three security officers. He did not give the details of the slain officers.

However, Daily Trust identified the officers as two soldiers and a police officer in a report.

Samuel stated that the situation had been brought under control through the swift intervention of security personnel and relevant agencies, adding that there was no immediate threat to participants, staff, residents or facilities of the institute.

“There is currently no threat to the safety of participants, staff, residents, or facilities of the Institute. Normal activities are continuing as scheduled,” he said.

“NIPSS is working closely with the appropriate authorities and will provide verified information as soon as it becomes available. We urge members of the public and the media to rely on official communications from the Institute and relevant security agencies,” he added.

He noted that the institute remained committed to the safety of its community and commended the professionalism of security personnel involved in the response.

However, sources told Daily Trust that the attackers appeared to have specifically targeted the residences of the Acting Director of Studies, Nima Salman-Mann, and another senior staff member, Haruna Dabin.

According to the sources, the two senior officials had received handwritten notes pasted on their doors on Saturday, demanding $100,000 and N15 million respectively, which were reportedly brought to the attention of the institute’s management before the attack.

The sources explained that while local vigilantes provide security during the day, soldiers and police personnel are stationed around the staff quarters at night, adding that the slain officers were killed during an exchange of gunfire with the assailants.

The attack on the nation’s premier policy and strategic think tank comes amid growing concerns over insecurity and the increasing vulnerability of public institutions and senior officials to violent attacks across the country.

Continue Reading

News

Court Fines ADC, Aregbesola N1m Over Application For Judge’s Recusal In Gombe’s Suit

Published

on

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Tuesday awarded a fine of one million Naira against the African Democratic Congress (ADC) and its embattled National Secretary, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, over the application seeking the judge’s withdrawal from the suit.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that ADC and Aregbesola had, in separate motions, asked Justice Peter Lifu to recuse himself from the suit filed by an aggrieved party member, Nafiu-Bala Gombe, citing alleged bias.

Delivering a ruling on Tuesday, Justice Lifu held that the motions lacked merit and were devoid of credible evidence aimed at frustrating the order of the Supreme Court for an accelerated hearing of the case.

The judge held that the reasons advanced in the affidavits by the applicants were extraneous.

According to him, the court has painstakingly considered all three processes by parties and by affidavit evidence; there is no iota of bias found. “There is no element of bias being painted by the applicants as alleged,” he said. The judge recalled that the motions for recusal were filed even when the court had yet to assume jurisdiction on the case. “Where then is the element of bias in the motions for recusal?’ he asked.

The judge, who described the applications as “an abuse of court process”, said the motions were fundamentally defective. “The law is settled that allegations of bias are grave allegations which are not made lightly. “It becomes apparent that the applicants have failed completely to prove the allegations.

“It is a cheap attempt to blackmail and intimidate the court. “As I said, nobody can intimidate the court,” he said. Justice Lifu held that judges should be careful to “accede to such baseless allegations so that they don’t allow litigants to choose judges that suit them.”

He further described the applications as “forum shopping”.

He said the applicants made the allegations so that the case could be assigned to another judge that would do their bidding.

“Parties cannot choose which court they should be heard in.

“Matters are assigned to judges by the administrative head of the court, and no applicant can choose who to hear and determine their matters.

“A judge must be firm in doing justice and not dance to the whims and caprices of counsel.

“No court worth its salt should allow this,” the judge said.

Justice Lifu, who said the entire application was based on speculation, said if allowed, lawyers could use this as a tool against the court when they know a case would not favour them.

According to him, if this application is granted in the absence of credible evidence, it will set a dangerous precedent.

“On the whole, I found no merit in the application, and it is hereby dismissed with N500,000 cost each against the applicants and in favour of the plaintiff,” the judge ruled.

Earlier when the case was called, a lawyer, Kalu-Kalu Agu, who appeared for Nkemakolam Ukandu, the National Welfare Secretary of ADC, challenged the judge from delivering the ruling, having ordered the deregistration of ADC in his judgement on Monday.

NAN reports that Agu, on behalf of Ukandu, had filed a motion seeking to be joined in Gombe’s suit.

The lawyer reminded the judge of his previous day’s judgment directing the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to deregister ADC, having failed to meet the constitutional threshold.

“My lord, the clerk of this court did mention the matter is slated for a ruling today. “In view of your lordship’s ruling and the continuous existence of the 1st defendant (ADC) in this matter, and having been declared dead, I don’t see any reason why this ruling should continue. “In your judgment, this court ordered INEC to deregister the 1st defendant. So in the eye of the law, the 1st defendant is not existing,” Agu submitted.

“Are you a party in this suit?” Justice Lifu asked.

“Yes, I am my lord,” Agu responded. “Who joined you, or did you join yourself in your chambers?” the judge asked.

In his reaction, Gombe’s lawyer, Robert Emukpoeruo, SAN, disagreed with Agu’s submission that he was a party in the suit. Emukpoeruo said he was yet to read the judgement mentioned by Agu; hence, it had no relevance in the instance proceedings.

He said by Order 9 Rule 14(4) of the court, until Ukandu is joined by the judge, he is yet to be a party. When Agu attempted to respond to Emukpoeruo’s submission, the judge threatened to invoke the powers of the court on him. Realwan Okpanachi, who appeared for Aregbesola; Suleiman Usman, SAN, lawyer to Sen. David Mark; and Peter Oyewole, who represented Chief Ralph Nwosu, also made their respective submissions.

In his ruling, Justice Lifu said the instant case was distinct from Monday’s matter, where a judgement was delivered against ADC. After the ruling, the case was adjourned until June 23 for hearing of all pending applications.

NAN reports that Gombe, in the suit, is seeking an order restraining Sen. Mark, the embattled National Chairman of ADC; Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola, the National Secretary; and members of their interim National Working Committee (NWC) from parading themselves as the party’s leaders.

He had argued that the emergence of Mark, Aregbesola and other NWC members as the party’s leaders breached the provisions of the party’s constitution and the Electoral Act.

Gombe had sued ADC, Mark, Aregbesola, the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and Ralph Nwosu as the 1st to 5th defendants, respectively, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1819/2025. Nwosu was the former ADC National Chairman who stepped down for David Mark’s leadership of the party. (NAN)

 

Continue Reading

Trending