Connect with us

Politics

Anti-Tinubu Coalition: Still Seeking Momentum

Published

on

Anti-Tinubu Coalition: Still Seeking Momentum

The coalition of opposition leaders spearheaded by former Vice President Atiku Abubakar and Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, which once gained significant momentum, is now losing steam, reducing to exploratory talks marked more by shared opposition to President Bola Tinubu than a coherent ideological vision, according to Punchng.com.

Nigeria’s current socio-political landscape closely mirrors that of 2013, when the country was charged by intense moves of opposition leaders plotting to unseat the then President Goodluck Jonathan. Widespread discontent and mounting national crises had spurred the coalition of opposition parties against the Jonathan’s administration.

The 2013 coalition, spearheaded by former Lagos State governor and now President Bola Tinubu, capitalised on growing public distrust, economic mismanagement, and unabated terrorism activities under Jonathan’s government to build strong political momentum.

The alliance leveraged the political strength of existing parties at the time, such as the Action Congress of Nigeria, the All Nigeria Peoples Party, the Congress for Progressive Change, and a faction of the All Progressives Grand Alliance, to form a united front that ultimately drove the PDP from power two years later.

At that time, the ruling Peoples Democratic Party was battling with deep internal fractures, which led to the defection of five governors out of the seven who staged a dramatic walkout during its national convention held at the Eagles’ Square in Abuja on August 31, 2013. The PDP subsequently splintered into factions that cracked its national dominance and shifted the political climate in favour of the Tinubu-led coalition that birthed the All Progressives Congress.

Back at same spot 12 years after

Nearly 12 years later, Nigeria has found itself at a similar turning point where a mix of economic crisis, rising insecurity and political disaffection have emboldened some opposition heavyweights to plan a formidable coalition against President Tinubu.

On March 20, 2025, former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, Labour Party’s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and ex-governor of Kaduna State, Mallam Nasir El-Rufai, announced the formation of a coalition aimed at unseating the APC-led administration in the 2027 elections.

In a recent post on his X handle, Atiku outlined the mission of the emerging alliance. “We are building a strong, united opposition coalition — one that will challenge the excesses of this administration, restore accountability, and return government to the people.

“We will protect the right of every Nigerian to freely choose their leaders, and we will continue to fight for economic justice, political freedom, and national progress. We are here to rescue Nigeria. And we will not stop until that goal is achieved,” he posted.

To achieve national spread, the Atiku/Obi-led coalition brought in prominent figures such as former Rivers State governor, Rotimi Amaechi, his Cross River counterpart, Liyel Imoke, former Secretary to the Government of the Federation, Babachir Lawal, former Kano State governor, Ibrahim Shekarau, and several other northern political heavyweights.

In a strategic move for political realignment, Obi has held private meetings with former Jigawa State governor, Sule Lamido and former Senate President, Bukola Saraki in recent months. The coalition leaders also met weeks back with some northern power blocs in a bid to rally support for the anti-Tinubu alliance in the region.

The meeting, convened by the National Political Consultative Group (North) had in attendance prominent figures including former Chairman of the PDP Board of Trustees, Adolphus Wabara, and former Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, SAN.

All talks, no clarity

Many political analysts have expressed mixed reactions over the coalition drive and prospects of opposition unity to achieve its agenda. While some observers see the coalition’s formation as a significant realignment in Nigerian politics, others regard it as sheer exploratory talks which lack ideological clarity beyond the anti-Tinubu sentiments.

In terms of leadership and power dynamics, some observers argue that the Atiku/Obi alliance is still in its consultation phase, and it is quite premature to assess its potential impact. Others, however, contend that the coalition could be undermined by internal power struggles, as its leading figures, Atiku and Obi, have competing ambitions, while the roles of several other prominent allies like El-Rufai remain unclear.

Another counterargument against the ongoing coalition is that some of its arrowheads appear to lack the political weight and mass appeal needed to unseat a dominant ruling party like the APC.

Atiku, who has been the major driver of the alliance, doesn’t have the credibility or command the kind of mass appeal that Buhari had in 2013 due to how he has been moving from one party to another, according to the President, National Association of Political Scientists, Prof Hassan Salisu.

“Buhari’s personality gave substance to the coalition in 2013. He was seen as somebody capable of doing so many things. But there’s nobody that’s very inspiring in the new coalition, not even Atiku.

“Also, Obi doesn’t have the kind of followership that Buhari had. Secondly, there are doubts whether he can retain the same number he had in 2023 this time around because of some developments,” Salisu explained.

But the Atiku’s staunch supporters argue that even Buhari switched political parties before he achieved his presidential ambition after his military stint. They add that cross-carpeting is a familiar trend among the politicians.

Atiku left the PDP for Action Congress in 2006 where he contested the presidential election in 2007, polling 2.6 million votes. He returned to the PDP in 2009, and later joined APC in 2013.

In 2017, Atiku left APC for PDP and got the party’s ticket to contest the 2019 presidential election. He polled 11.2 million votes to come second to Buhari. Atiku also failed to leverage his region’s voting strength to defeat the APC presidential candidate, Tinubu in 2023 as he got 6.9 million votes.

Some Nigerians considered Atiku as someone lacking ideological consistency and driven solely by personal ambition. Others, however, argue that Obi’s debut in the presidential race significantly undercut Atiku’s chances, especially given the former Anambra governor’s strong appeal among the youth.

The pro-Atiku analysts stated that the former vice president would have defeated Tinubu with a landslide had Obi not run against him.

But others believe the Atiku-Obi alliance still wouldn’t have stopped the APC’s return to power as the pair could only muster 11.2 million votes in the 2019 poll despite the widespread dissatisfaction with Buhari’s first-term performance.

Amid the controversies, it has been argued that the fragile state of the opposition parties and their conspicuous absence from the coalition struggle may be another big stumbling block.

Counting opposition losses

Back in 2013, the opposition bloc that collapsed its structures into the APC was formidable enough to pull in governors and heavyweight politicians from the then ruling PDP. The likes of Amaechi, Rabiu Kwankwaso (Kano), Aliyu Wamakko (Sokoto), Murtala Nyako (Adamawa), Abdulfatah Ahmed (Kwara), who were all governors at the time, dumped the ruling PDP to pitch tent with the opposition APC.

Today, however, the leading opposition parties, notably the PDP, LP, and New Nigeria Peoples Party have been grappling with internal crises that have cost them key political figures.

Beyond losing over 30 lawmakers to the APC in the National Assembly over the past two years, the opposition has also ceded some of its former strongholds across the federation, including Delta State, to the ruling party. Before the 2023 general elections, opposition parties controlled 16 states, 15 of which were held by the PDP, while the APC had 20 states. But the political map has since changed. The APC now controls 23 states, while the opposition holds 13 with the PDP accounting for 10, while APGA, NNPP, and LP control one state each.

In what could be seen as a potential setback for the ongoing coalition, leading opposition parties, including the PDP and LP, have publicly distanced themselves from the alliance talks. On April 14, 2025, the PDP governors declared at a meeting that the party would not join any coalition.

Similarly, the Labour Party, in a 12-point resolution adopted at the National Executive Council meeting of the party on May 2, 2025 in Abuja, said it will not enter into any coalition or alliance ahead of the 2027 general elections.

It has been argued in some quarters that the absence of the major opposition parties from the coalition will weaken its prosperity, resulting in a fragmented front to the advantage of the APC.

However, both Atiku and Obi’s camps have, at different forums, affirmed their readiness to either adopt one of the existing political parties or create a new platform to mount a strong challenge against the APC. Initially, the coalition had wanted to adopt the SDP but the party’s leadership rejected the move. The African Democratic Congress is now considered as the platform of the coalition to challenge Tinubu in 2027.

Amid the uncertainties, a chieftain of the PDP, Segun Sowunmi, maintained that ultimately, only one party would emerge as the coalition’s platform of choice, and only one individual can become its presidential candidate.

“As far as I am concerned, I don’t believe they are building any coalition. What I think they are doing is what you call ‘forum-shopping,’ looking for a platform that suits their ambition. That kind of effort can only serve one person. But if too many of them are chasing the same goal, well, good luck to them,” Sowunmi told Sunday PUNCH.

Atiku/Obi allies speak

Speaking to Sunday PUNCH, Atiku’s media aide, Paul Ibe, dismissed any negative claims against the coalition’s agenda. He said, contrary to widespread reports, there would be no clash of interests among the coalition leaders. “Atiku, Obi, and other coalition stakeholders are in talks, and once concluded, they will make the way forward public,” Ibe stated.

He insisted that those who believe internal conflicts will tear down the coalition are Tinubu’s loyalists, who are bent on turning Nigeria into a one-party state. “The coalition will succeed and ultimately provide Nigerians with a viable platform to reclaim and rebuild the country in line with their aspirations,” the Atiku’s aide affirmed.

In his comment, Obi’s ally, Peter Ameh, added that the coalition movement remained steadfast in its mission to foster steady, organic growth, prioritising unity and connection with the everyday struggles of Nigerians.

He said the formation strongly believed that sustainable progress is essential for building a coalition that resonates with the majority, particularly the common man on the street, who he said continues to bear the brunt of the current administration’s failure to deliver effective governance. “Contrary to some observers’ narrow assertions, our movement is not driven by any particular individual or group of individuals, but rather by the collective desire of the Nigerian people to see a change in governance,” Ameh added.

As Atiku, Obi, and others continue to champion the anti-Tinubu coalition agenda, the sharp contrast between this unfolding movement and the 2013 experiments is fuelling growing doubts about how far the current alliance can truly go in its bid to unseat the ruling APC. Will it succeed in the long run despite the visible cracks? Can it hit its target without the full cooperation of the established opposition giants? Only time will tell.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

REVEALED: Why Makinde Dropped Speaker Ogundoyin and Picked Bimbo Adekanmbi as Successor

Published

on

In a move that has reshuffled Oyo’s 2027 election chessboard, many political watchers are still wondering why Gov. Seyi Makinde bypassed his much touted preferred choice of Adebo Ogundoyin -Oyo House of Assembly Speaker for his finance commissioner, Bimbo Adekanmbi.

Although the governor didn’t publicly “drop” Ogundoyin to make it look like there was a feud,those who know say there were a lot of shenanigans underneath.Those who know a thing or two about Oyo inside politics say Makinde had long jettisoned Ogundoyin as his preferred choice but kept it close to his chest.He also initially looked at other names before finally settling on Adekanmbi.

Here’s why Adekanmbi emerged over early nominees like Ogundoyin and others: The “Loyalty to Oyo State” .

Recommended

JUST IN: Tinubu Appoints New Presidential Adviser on National Assembly Matters

politicsnigeria.com

2 hrs

My Father Hired Her To Be His Private Chef But She Seduced Him And Became His Wife – NG

naijapals.com

18 hrs
0
16
Makinde told stakeholders he wanted someone “loyal to Oyo State” and with capacity, not just party loyalty. Insiders said he rejected early nominees because of perceived outside ties.

People like Fatai Owoseni. Concern was his long service outside Oyo, especially in Lagos and Benue. Some in Makinde’s camp saw him as too close to Lagos political interests and it is a known fact where Makinde and the Lagos Power brokers belong even extending to the federal so he was somewhat of a risky choice.

How about Adedeji Olajide? Seen as too aligned with APC figures at the federal level, including the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila.That too, was a big risk.

Makinde’s phrase was: “There was anxiety about external influence. The governor was looking beyond popularity. He wanted someone whose political loyalty would remain rooted in Oyo State.

Makinde framed the choice of Adekanmbi as merit over partisanship. He said: “For us, if you’re from Oyo State and you’re loyal to Oyo State, and you have the capacity, we will tap you”.

Trade Forex with Ultra-Low Spreads
Access 61+ currency pairs with raw spreads from 0.0 pips, lightning-fast execution and 24/7 support. Trading derivatives involves high risk to your capital.
IC
by TaboolaSponsored Links
He also said “what matters is competence, and provided the candidate is an indigene of the state”.

Adekanmbi is an accountant/technocrat who served as Commissioner for Finance under Ajimobi and has been linked to projects like the Ibadan Airport upgrade. There was also the issue of continuity. “Omituntun’ agenda.

Makinde publicly called Adekanmbi the one to continue the “Omituntun” development agenda. At the unveiling ,he said: “You have tasted Omituntun 1.0 and 2.0 ,this is Omituntun 3.0” and urged Adekanmbi to “improve on the good things we have done for the benefit of the people”. He also told Adekanmbi: “don’t inherit my enemies; chart your own path”.

Sources also reveal that Political realignment may have also contributed to the change in successor. Makinde was said to have introduced Adekanmbi and Saheed Fijabi as fresh names during closed-door talks, which changed the tone of deliberations. He later confirmed Adekanmbi as APM’s consensus governorship candidate, describing it as part of a broader strategy that “will also go national very soon”, in reference to his own Presidential ambition announced at the time.

However,there are those who swore that Ogundoyin wasn’t rejected, adding ,he led the lawmakers to endorse Adekanmbi and described him as “an experienced political figure capable of sustaining good governance”. Reports frame it more as Makinde choosing a technocrat outsider rather than a sitting legislator, to emphasize competence and state-loyalty over internal APM politics.

However ,not all Makinde loyalists agreed to his choice. A 21-member stakeholder panel reportedly voted 20-1 for Dr Debo Akande over Adekanmbi,citing his tenure as Finance Commissioner under late Gov. Ajimobi when there were salary arrears,among other issues.

Makinde has defended him, saying party color won’t matter and that the electorates would decide come 2027.

Ultimately,the key reasons cited for Makinde picking Adekanmbi over earlier names like Ogundoyin were: loyalty rooted in Oyo State, administrative competence, and ability to continue his policies, with a deliberate move away from federal/APC-aligned influences.

Source: City People

Continue Reading

Politics

2027: ADC Gov Candidate Announces Top Ex-Lawmaker as Running Mate

Published

on

The governorship candidate of the African Democratic Congress in Kaduna State, Isa Ashiru, on Tuesday announced a former three-term member of the Kaduna State House of Assembly, Irmiya Kantiok, as his running mate for the 2027 governorship election.

Ashiru, in a statement announcing the decision on Wednesday, described Kantiok as a seasoned legal practitioner and experienced legislator whose wealth of experience would strengthen the party’s quest to provide purposeful leadership for Kaduna State.

Kantiok represented Zonkwa Constituency in the Kaduna State House of Assembly for three consecutive terms.

Announcing his choice, Ashiru said, “Today, I proudly announce Barrister Irmiya Ishaku Kantiok as my running mate for the 2027 gubernatorial race under our great party, the African Democratic Congress .”

He described Kantiok as a leader whose professional and political credentials align with the aspirations of the party and the people of Kaduna State.

“A battle-tested legal titan and former Kaduna State House of Assembly member for three terms representing Zonkwa Constituency, Barrister Ishaku Kantiok embodies the intellect, integrity and resilience Kaduna State deserves at this time of its development,” Ashiru said.

The ADC candidate noted that Kantiok’s accomplishments in the legal profession and legislature reflected his dedication to justice, accountability and inclusive governance.

“His courtroom victories and legislative service reflect an unyielding commitment to justice, good governance and equitable development, as well as fighting for the people even amid electoral storms that tested true character,” he added.

Ashiru said their joint ticket would focus on uniting the state, strengthening institutions and accelerating development across all three senatorial districts.

“Together, we will forge a united Kaduna State where the rule of law reigns, youths thrive, infrastructure expands, and every zone rises. This is a ticket of experience, competence and vision for a greater and more prosperous Kaduna State,” he said.

He called on residents of the state and supporters of the ADC to rally behind the party ahead of the 2027 governorship election, expressing confidence that the party’s agenda would deliver inclusive governance, sustainable development and renewed hope for the people of Kaduna State.

Continue Reading

Politics

2027 Presidency: Kwankwaso Breaks Silence on Peter Obi’s Controversial One-Term Commitment

Published

on

Tinubu-Kwankwaso VP Offer Not An Insult, Says Johnson

The vice-presidential candidate of the Nigeria Democratic Congress (NDC), Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, has expressed confidence that the party’s presidential candidate, Peter Obi, will keep his promise to spend only one term in office if elected President in 2027.

Kwankwaso spoke during an interview on News Central’s 60 Minutes with Mr Kay, where he was asked about Obi’s commitment to a single four-year tenure and the political arrangement within the NDC coalition.

The former Kano State governor said he had no reason to doubt Obi, noting that the former Anambra State governor had made the commitment publicly.

“I personally believe Peter Obi is a gentleman and I have every reason to trust him, especially that he said it to the hearing of everybody. Nobody should have any reason to doubt him,” Kwankwaso said.

Kwankwaso explained that the coalition’s power-sharing understanding was founded on mutual trust among its members and an agreement on how political power should be rotated.

He argued that the arrangement would allow the southern part of the country to complete what the coalition considers an eight-year presidential cycle before power shifts.

“We believe the southern part of the country should complete its second term and, with that, and to the hearing of everybody in this country, I don’t believe any gentleman would want to renege, would want to say no or change his or her mind,” he stated.

Kwankwaso maintained that Obi’s one-term commitment was not merely a personal declaration but formed part of the broader understanding among members of the political alliance.

The NDC vice-presidential candidate also said the coalition had gone beyond discussions about individuals and political blocs by developing a common governance programme.

According to him, the alliance has drawn up short-, medium- and long-term plans that would guide the administration if the party wins the 2027 presidential election.

“More importantly, we have collectively gotten a short-term, medium-term and, of course, long-term plan for this country. It does not matter whether it is him from the Obidient side, or my humble self from the Kwankwasiyya side or another side, we believe we have an agenda,” he said.

He added that the coalition’s priority was to ensure that subsequent leaders remained committed to the agreed programme irrespective of their political background or support base.

“That agenda, we will as much as possible ensure that whoever comes, maybe Peter, maybe me or any other person, would stick to that programme,” he added.

Kwankwaso stressed that continuity of the coalition’s policies would remain important beyond the tenure of any individual President, insisting that the NDC’s objective was to build a governance framework capable of surviving changes in leadership.

Continue Reading

Trending